Person Candie Davidson-Goldbronn Depp v. Heard← All People
Witness

Candie Davidson-Goldbronn

Corporate designee for Children's Hospital Los Angeles, testifying in her institutional capacity via deposition. She represented the hospital's records, correspondence, and pledge-tracking functions — not as a personal acquaintance of either party. Her role at CHLA involved managing major donor relationships and following up on outstanding charitable commitments, including Heard's multi-year pledge.

Testimony Impact

Through hospital records, Davidson-Goldbronn established that Heard's $3.5M CHLA pledge yielded only $250,000 as of March 2021 — roughly 7% — the sole direct payment being a $250,000 Fidelity Charity transfer in January 2018. She documented the hospital's June 2019 outreach: letters to both Heard's contact Jody Gottlieb and accountant Edward White seeking further installments, neither of which received a reply. On cross, Bredehoft reframed the pledge as open-ended: no deadline was ever set, the obligation had not expired, and CHLA would welcome any future payment — softening the direct examination's portrait of a lapsed commitment.

Notable Quotes From The Record

“I was trying to figure out if there were any other payments coming from Mr. White to fulfill the pledge because we had -- because Children's Hospital Los Angeles had not received any other correspondence from him.”

Documents the hospital's proactive outreach to White, underscoring the pledge had not been serviced and communications had lapsed.

“I was trying to see if the pledge was going to be fulfilled or not.”

States plainly that the hospital considered the pledge outstanding and was seeking to determine whether it would ever be paid.

“$250,000.”

Total donated by Heard to CHLA from 2016 through March 2021 — approximately 7% of the pledged $3.5 million.

“No.”

Heard never responded to the hospital's written inquiry about fulfilling the pledge.

“There was no date arrangement with Ms. Heard to have this pledge paid off at a particular time.”

Establishes the pledge carried no deadline, countering any characterization of a default.

“The CHLA welcomes every and any donation that comes its way.”

Confirms CHLA remains open to receiving the balance, framing the unfulfilled pledge as still viable rather than closed.

“Not that I'm aware of, no. It has not expired.”

Direct confirmation that the pledge has not lapsed, softening the impact of the direct examination's focus on the $3.25M unpaid.

Key Moments

Evidence From Their Proceedings (3)

Appearances (2)