Person Jack Whigham Depp v. Heard← All People
Witness

Jack Whigham

Courtroom still of Jack Whigham.

Johnny Depp’s talent agent and witness on his film deals and career prospects.

2022 Defamation Trial Apr 11 – Jun 1, 2022
Called by plaintiff
197 lines 3 proceedings 10 highlights

About

Jack Whigham represented Johnny Depp as a CAA talent agent beginning in October 2016. He testified about Depp’s film projects and his prospects around the December 2018 op-ed. Whigham said he had reached a $22.5 million agreement for another Pirates of the Caribbean film, but acknowledged on cross-examination that he had not seen written documentation confirming that figure. He explained that formal paperwork can follow high-level verbal agreements in franchise deals.

Whigham attributed a decline in Depp’s studio-film opportunities to the op-ed and said financing trouble on Minamata led to a reduction in Depp’s fee. Heard’s counsel challenged the timing and cause of that decline, citing Whigham’s earlier deposition and press coverage that predated the op-ed. Whigham said Disney’s position was already worsening in late 2018, but had not formally ruled Depp out two days after the op-ed; he said the loss of the role became clear to him in early 2019. An economic damages expert later used Whigham’s $22.5 million figure in a lost-earnings calculation, while acknowledging that his analysis did not establish what caused the loss.

Trial Record (3)

2022 Defamation Trial Apr 11, 2022 – Jun 1, 2022 3 proceedings

Day 12

Direct Direct Examination of Jack Whigham Jack Whigham Benjamin Chew 4 106
Summary

Depp's agent Whigham details his studio-film career and $22.5M Pirates 6 deal, testifying that Heard's op-ed led to zero studio work and Disney dropping Depp.

Highlights (4)
Quote

“with respect to Johnny, it was catastrophic because it was coming from, you know, a first-person account. It was not from a journalist. It was not from someone observing. It was from someone saying, "This happened to me."”

Open in transcript → Watch this moment ▶
Cross Cross-Examination of Jack Whigham Jack Whigham Elaine Bredehoft 4 80
Summary

Bredehoft challenged Whigham's Pirates 6 deal claim, extracted an admission of no written contract, and introduced pre-op-ed UK press to argue earlier causes for Depp's career decline.

Highlights (4)
Quote

“My testimony is that it reads like a victim statement from someone involved and the recipient, and it became a, yes, a bit of a death knell, catastrophic thing for Mr. Depp in the Hollywood community.”

Open in transcript → Watch this moment ▶
Redirect Redirect Examination of Jack Whigham Jack Whigham Benjamin Chew 2 11
Summary

Chew rehabilitates Whigham on the undocumented Pirates 6 deal and clarifies Disney had not formally dropped Depp as of the December 2018 op-ed date.

Highlights (2)
Quote

“Often on a franchise movie, when you're dealing with big stars and you're talking about future optional pictures, you engage at the high level, meaning the president or the top of the studio, to get an understanding of what that deal is going to be.”

Open in transcript → Watch this moment ▶
Quote

“it was trending badly in the late fall on behalf of Disney, but I was - but Jerry Bruckheimer and I were lobbying to make it happen. And so we had hoped, and it became clear to me in early 2019 that it was over.”

Open in transcript → Watch this moment ▶

Evidence From Their Proceedings (6)