Penney Azcarate

Summary

Jury selection before Judge Azcarate: hardship excusals, individual voir dire on pretrial publicity, and attorney questioning of the 21-person panel.

Highlights (5)

Summary

Benjamin Chew and Camille Vasquez outline Depp's theory that Heard fabricated abuse allegations to control him and advance her career, causing irreparable harm to his reputation.

Summary

Rottenborn and Bredehoft present Heard's opening, arguing the 2018 op-ed is First Amendment-protected policy advocacy, not defamation, and previewing evidence of Depp's abuse.

Summary

Depp's sister and personal manager testifies about a childhood marked by their mother's abuse, her observations of the Depp-Heard relationship, and Heard's divorce filing timed to the day after their mother's death.

Summary

Rottenborn uses 2013–2014 text messages to contradict Christi Dembrowski's denials, showing she knew of Depp's substance abuse and expressed concern to Heard in writing.

Summary

Judge rules on admissibility of text message exhibits 163, 210, and 214, then addresses a sidebar report of a juror waving at Johnny Depp.

Highlights (2)

Summary

Rottenborn uses Dr. Kipper's email and Christi's own texts to establish that concerns about Depp's substance abuse and on-set conduct came from sources beyond Amber Heard.

Summary

Chew's brief redirect is largely blocked by sustained hearsay objections, leaving only Christi's personal observations about Heard's presentation style intact.

Summary

Depp's longtime friend and Eastern Columbia Building neighbor testifies he observed no injuries on Heard's face during multiple close-range encounters on May 22–25, 2016.

Summary

Bredehoft challenges Baruch's injury observations through makeup expertise gaps, reveals his financial dependence on Depp, and introduces texts where Depp calls Heard a "cunt."

Summary

ECB general manager Patterson authenticates 87 security video clips from May 2016, confirms chain of custody, and describes Depp as "animated" then "upset" in elevator footage.

Summary

Heard's counsel questions ex-personal assistant on Waldman contacts, absence of observed violence, and impeaches her with contradictory UK trial testimony about a Depp text.

Summary

Couples therapist Anderson recounts 2015 sessions, describing Heard's self-reported initiation of physical violence and a dynamic she characterized as mutual abuse.

Summary

Depp friend Gina Deuters testifies about his substance use and her observations of Heard's behavior, before a sidebar over her social media posts interrupts the examination.

Summary

Judge Azcarate strikes Gina Deuters' testimony after she admits watching trial clips, then bars non-legal-team from front row following Eve Barlow's note-passing.

Highlights (3)

Summary

Depp's private physician testifies about Depp's polysubstance treatment, the 2014 Bahamas detox, and his observations at the Australia house following the March 2015 finger injury.

Summary

Defense counsel reads Depp's hostile texts about Dr. Cowan and medication requests, then presses Kipper on non-payment and pre-deposition prep with Depp's legal team.

Summary

Meyers cross-examined Depp's addiction nurse through her contemporaneous nursing notes, documenting Depp-Heard relationship tensions throughout 2014–2015 treatment without evidence of witnessed physical violence.

Summary

Depp's security guard testifies he photographed Depp's 2015 injuries, never observed injuries on Heard, and witnessed no violence by Depp against Heard including on May 21, 2016.

Summary

Rottenborn challenges Bett's credibility through text message impeachment, deposition contradictions, and surveillance video showing a 90-minute stay Bett had significantly underestimated.

Summary

Vasquez rehabilitates Bett on May 21 sobriety and penthouse layout, and closes with Bett stating his safety concerns were for Depp alone.

Summary

Sound technician and longtime Depp friend Keenan Wyatt testified about Depp's professionalism, earpiece use, and a 2014 Boston flight incident involving Heard.

Summary

Bredehoft challenged Wyatt on Depp's film contracts, Australia production delays, the 2014 Boston flight, and impeached his denial of knowing any prior violence allegations against Depp.

Highlights (1)

Summary

Chew rehabilitates Wyatt on financial independence and elicits that Depp's Pirates 5 lateness stemmed from arguments with Heard, not substance abuse.

Summary

Depp testifies about his childhood abuse, career origins, substance history, and the beginnings of his relationship with Heard, denying he ever struck her.

Summary

Depp describes escalating verbal and physical abuse by Heard, including the Australia finger injury, staircase punch, and career devastation from Heard's 2018 op-ed.

Summary

Rottenborn challenges Depp on the op-ed's limited scope, establishes Disney dropped him before the op-ed, and introduces a divorce document stating neither party made false accusations.

Summary

Rottenborn impeached Depp with violent texts about Heard, drug-use admissions contradicting claimed sobriety, and inconsistencies in his Australia finger-injury account.

Summary

Rottenborn continued cross of Depp with audio recordings of arguments and texts revealing violent wishes toward Heard and a finger injury admission.

Summary

On redirect, Meyers asked Depp to explain the Bettany texts, the term 'monster,' recordings of arguments, his finger injury, and the San Francisco knife incident.

Summary

Depp's former house manager describes finding the severed fingertip, extensive Australia property damage, and Heard asking if he had ever 'lost it' on the flight to LA.

Summary

Heard's counsel challenged King on timeline gaps in Australia, his selective sharing of damage photos, and admitted photos of cuts on Heard's arm while two audio recordings were excluded as hearsay.

Highlights (1)

Summary

Moniz uses a floor plan to geolocate Australia damage and the fingertip discovery, while rehabilitating King's photo-taking as routine professional practice.

Summary

Depp's island manager of 15 years describes a December 2015 altercation in which Heard berated Depp, blocked his vehicle, and grabbed at him; Roberts saw a mark on Depp's nose, no injuries on Heard.

Summary

Bredehoft establishes Roberts' $120K annual salary from Depp as a bias foundation, elicits admissions she could not observe the house interior, and draws out that Depp was passed out face-first on the beach in summer 2013.

Summary

A brief redirect in which one drug-consumption question is sustained as leading, then Roberts reframes the beach incident from cross as a hammock fall rather than incapacitation.

Summary

Forensic psychologist Shannon Curry testifies that Amber Heard has borderline and histrionic personality disorders, does not have PTSD, and showed gross exaggeration of PTSD symptoms during testing.

Summary

Bredehoft challenges Curry's independence through her pre-retention dinner with Depp, an expert designation listing opinions Curry hadn't formed, and prior-statement impeachment on IPV expertise.

Summary

Pre-deposition sidebar resolves exhibit admissibility for Officer Saenz testimony; incident report admitted, injury photos excluded for lack of foundation.

Highlights (2)

Summary

LAPD Officer Saenz testifies she saw no injuries on Heard and filed no report for the May 21, 2016 penthouse call, spending only 15 minutes on scene.

Summary

Bredehoft's brief redirect reconfirms via elevator timestamps that Officers Saenz and Hadden spent approximately 15 minutes at the penthouse on May 21, 2016.

Summary

ECB front desk worker testifies she noticed no injuries on Heard on May 25, 2016, but Bredehoft establishes she was not actively observing Heard's face.

Summary

Pre-deposition sidebar where Judge Azcarate ruled on exhibit admissibility for three upcoming deposition playbacks: Laura Wasser, Christian Carino, and ACLU's Terence Dougherty.

Summary

CAA talent agent Christian Carino testifies about Depp's reputation and career, attributing the loss of Pirates 6 to Heard's allegations while maintaining Depp's acting reputation remained unchanged.

Summary

ACLU COO confirms Heard paid $1.3M of a pledged $3.5M donation, and that ACLU staff drafted the 2018 Washington Post op-ed, timing its release to coincide with Aquaman.

Summary

Depp's accountant testified about the April 21, 2016 meeting, settlement negotiations totaling $14.25M, charity payments, and Heard's wine orders at the birthday party.

Summary

Rottenborn impeaches Depp's business manager on prior oath statements about financial catastrophe, Depp's work punctuality, and the nature of Heard's charitable pledge.

Summary

Dennison elicits the pledge letter language confirming Heard's $3.5M gift as installment-based, then closes by confirming Depp is fully current on all taxes.

Summary

Depp's security guard Malcolm Connolly testified remotely about arguments, objects thrown by Heard, recurring marks on Depp, and the chaotic Australia finger-injury day.

Summary

Defense cross-examined Connolly on financial ties to Depp, gaps in direct observation, UK testimony omissions, and played an audio clip of Depp's agitated state in Australia.

Summary

Moniz briefly redirected on Connolly's observation conditions in Australia: roughly 3-4 feet from Heard for 15-20 seconds in faint stairwell light.

Summary

Depp's longtime driver and security testified he saw no injuries on Heard after the April 21 penthouse incident and that she described the bed defecation as a "practical joke gone wrong."

Summary

Rottenborn questioned Jenkins about his employment and loyalty to Depp, his phone-location testimony and UK statement, and a series of incidents he did not witness.

Summary

Crawford completed Rottenborn's partial UK statement quote and clarified Amber — not Whitney — was sick at Coachella before Jenkins was released.

Summary

Court handles expert attendance, witness address redaction, exhibit housekeeping, and rules on the scope of Richard Marks's op-ed impact testimony.

Highlights (2)

Summary

McGivern, Depp's bodyguard for nine years, describes escalating arguments after Australia and testifies he witnessed Heard punch Depp in the face during a March 2015 penthouse incident.

Summary

Rottenborn challenges McGivern's account of the March 23, 2015 incident using his UK trial witness statement and establishes he was absent from most disputed incidents.

Summary

Depp's agent Whigham details his studio-film career and $22.5M Pirates 6 deal, testifying that Heard's op-ed led to zero studio work and Disney dropping Depp.

Summary

Bredehoft challenged Whigham's Pirates 6 deal claim, extracted an admission of no written contract, and introduced pre-op-ed UK press to argue earlier causes for Depp's career decline.

Summary

Chew rehabilitates Whigham on the undocumented Pirates 6 deal and clarifies Disney had not formally dropped Depp as of the December 2018 op-ed date.

Summary

Depp's entertainment law expert Richard Marks details nearly 50 years of industry experience and opines that Heard's 2018 op-ed caused devastating reputational harm to Depp's career.

Summary

Nadelhaft challenged Marks's $975/hour fee and credentials, then cataloged pre-op-ed negative publicity about Depp to contest the causal link between Heard's op-ed and his career harm.

Summary

Lecaroz rehabilitates Marks on redirect, eliciting that pre-existing negative press did not change Depp's Hollywood standing while the op-ed was categorically different.

Summary

IP damages expert Doug Bania testifies that Q scores and Google search results show measurable reputational decline for Depp following Heard's 2016 allegations and 2018 op-ed.

Summary

Nadelhaft questioned Bania about his deposition testimony, Google Trends results, and the three Q-score time points used in his analysis.

Summary

Lecaroz rehabilitates Bania on two cross points: his opinion that the op-ed negatively impacted Depp's image and the rationale for his three-point Q score methodology.

Summary

Forensic accountant Spindler testified to $40.3M in Depp lost earnings: $20.25M net from the lost Pirates 6 role and ~$20M net from reduced non-franchise bookings post-op-ed.

Summary

Rottenborn questioned Spindler about the absence of a written Pirates 6 contract, his choice of 2017 as a baseline, and the limits of his opinion on causation.

Summary

Two-question redirect in which Spindler defends his 2017 base year choice and earnings-comparison methodology; witness excused subject to recall.

Summary

Plaintiff rests; defense moves to strike all three defamatory statements; judge denies as to statements 2 and 3 and takes statement 1 under advisement.

Highlights (1)

Summary

Defense expert Dr. Dawn Hughes testified that Heard's reported abuse is consistent with intimate partner violence and that she suffers from PTSD attributed to Depp's conduct.

Summary

Dennison challenged Hughes on gender bias, financial stake, and flawed PTSD testing methodology, then played an audio recording of Heard admitting to hitting Depp and starting physical fights.

Summary

Bredehoft rehabilitates Hughes via additional audio clips showing Depp acknowledging mutual violence, while hearsay objections block full test document admission.

Summary

Heard testifies about her Texas upbringing, her romance with Depp beginning in 2011, and alleged escalating physical and sexual abuse incidents from 2012 to 2013.

Summary

Heard's direct continues through alleged abuse incidents: Tokyo 2013, London Fields, Met Gala, Boston plane, Bahamas detox, and the three-day Australia incident including alleged bottle assault.

Summary

Heard walks the jury through April 2015–May 2016 alleged abuse, culminating in a detailed account of the May 21, 2016 penthouse phone-throwing incident, with photos and audio admitted.

Summary

Judge rules at sidebar on Depp's motion to admit Heard's alleged prior violent conduct toward Tasya van Ree and Rocky Pennington for impeachment.

Highlights (1)

Summary

Vasquez opens Heard's cross with audio recordings and event photographs showing no visible injuries, then presses Heard on her public pledge to donate the $7 million divorce settlement.

Summary

Judge sustains objection to Heard's photo metadata exhibits and rules Heard's team may continue de-designating deposition clips under the 61-hour time constraint.

Highlights (1)

Summary

Vasquez cross-examines Heard across Australia, penthouse, Bahamas, 30th birthday, May 21 and the op-ed, repeatedly contrasting her testimony with recordings, photos, witness accounts and the UK record.

Summary

Bredehoft rehabilitates Heard on TMZ connections, Depp's post-mediation love note, ENT nose injuries, December 2015 Falati reporting, and Waldman's UK trial conduct.

Summary

Wright confirms he never witnessed Depp assault Heard, describes Depp's substance-fueled behavior as misogynistic and cruel, and characterizes Heard's drug use as minimal.

Summary

Vasquez examines Heard's close friend Raquel Pennington on prior legal statements, drug use, a physical altercation at Holly Drive, and the limits of her Hicksville observations.

Summary

Court signed a juror order and ruled on admissibility of photo timestamps for Raquel Pennington's deposition, distinguishing iPhone display data from extracted metadata.

Highlights (2)

Summary

Rottenborn's cross of Pennington covers Depp's "monster" alter ego, December 2015 and May 21 injury photos, and her first-hand account of the penthouse confrontation.

Summary

Heard's younger sister testifies about Depp's substance-driven controlling behavior across their relationship and directly witnessing Depp strike both her and Heard during the March 2015 staircase incident.

Summary

Lecaroz challenges Whitney's bias through financial ties to Depp, narrows her eyewitness scope to the staircase incident alone, and impeaches her with a 2015 text message.

Summary

Heard's makeup artist describes facial injuries she observed on December 16, 2015 and the specialized techniques she used to conceal them for Heard's James Corden show appearance.

Summary

Judge reprimands Chew for violating her photography order near the courthouse, discloses a TikTok balcony incident involving courthouse staff's children, and limits Bercovici to rebuttal.

Highlights (2)

Summary

Depp's UTA agent of 30 years testified via deposition that his behavior grew increasingly unprofessional through substance abuse, chronic lateness, and worsening anger.

Summary

Depp's former business manager Joel Mandel testifies by deposition about Depp's financial decline, substance abuse, and directly refutes Depp's claim that TMG failed to file his taxes.

Summary

Heard's counsel examines Depp's attorney Waldman about Daily Mail statements calling Heard's allegations a hoax, as Chew repeatedly invokes attorney-client privilege to block answers.

Summary

LAPD DV coordinator Marie Sadanaga explains department protocols, including mandatory documentation requirements and the significance of 'verbal dispute' language used in May 2016.

Summary

Post-lunch sidebar in which Heard's team argued Bercovici should testify beyond rebutting Frost; Judge Azcarate upheld her prior ruling that he is a rebuttal expert only.

Highlights (3)

Summary

Heard's counsel walks Ron Schnell through his computer science credentials and social media forensic expertise before tendering him as an expert; Depp's team requests voir dire.

Summary

Dennison's opening voir dire question about Schnell's tweet analysis is cut off when the court sustains an objection limiting voir dire to qualifications only.

Highlights (1)

Summary

At sidebar, Judge Azcarate clarified that voir dire is for expert qualification only; Dennison conceded no objection, and the court admitted Heard's social media expert in open court.

Highlights (3)

Summary

Heard's expert Ron Schnell presents Twitter API analysis showing 2.38 million negative hashtag uses against Heard, with spikes correlating to Waldman's alleged defamatory statements.

Summary

Nadelhaft's redirect reaffirms Schnell's core findings: all sampled "justice for Johnny Depp" tweets were negative toward Heard, 25%+ cited Waldman, and negative volume doubled after April 2020.

Summary

Disney's corporate designee confirms no company documents reference Heard's op-ed and no decision-maker cited it in connection with Depp's casting.

Summary

Ellen Barkin testifies for Heard about Depp's substance abuse, jealous controlling behavior, and a wine bottle he threw in a Las Vegas hotel room during Fear and Loathing filming.

Summary

Heard's op-ed attorney Eric George testifies he reviewed the December 2018 Washington Post piece to minimize defamation risk and that Heard followed all his legal advice.

Summary

Heard's WME agent Kovacevic testified Aquaman failed to boost Heard's career as expected and that Waldman's statements caused tangible harm, including a lost Amazon film.

Summary

Defense orthopedic expert Richard Moore testifies Depp's finger injury is inconsistent with a thrown vodka bottle, citing intact nail, palmar tissue loss, and absent glass.

Summary

Vasquez challenges Moore's finger-injury opinion, establishing he never examined Depp, didn't review bar-scene photos, and could not rule out a vodka bottle as the cause.

Summary

Rottenborn rehabilitates defense hand expert Moore, who reaffirms that Depp's vodka-bottle account is inconsistent with the finger injury pattern.

Summary

Bredehoft qualifies psychiatrist Dr. David Spiegel as Heard's expert in psychiatry, substance abuse, and IPV; Dennison objects and requests voir dire of his qualifications.

Summary

Dennison challenges Spiegel's IPV credentials during voir dire, establishing no IPV-titled publications or CV entries; court admits him as expert over objection.

Highlights (1)

Summary

Bredehoft elicits Dr. Spiegel's opinions linking Depp's polysubstance abuse and narcissistic traits to intimate partner violence risk factors, over repeated Dennison objections.

Summary

Dennison cross-examines Dr. Spiegel, attacking Goldwater Rule compliance, NPD traits-vs-diagnosis, MMSE methodology, and a deposition "idiot" comment about Depp.

Summary

Bredehoft rehabilitates Spiegel by distinguishing private records from the Goldwater Rule, walking through narcissistic-trait evidence, rebutting BPD diagnoses across multiple treating clinicians, and displaying Australia destruction and passed-out photos as IPV risk-factor evidence.

Summary

Defense entertainment expert Kathryn Arnold testifies that Depp's career decline predated the op-ed and that the Waldman defamatory statements caused $45–50M in losses to Heard.

Summary

Dennison questioned Arnold about the claimed link between Waldman's statements and Heard's career losses, her comparable actors, and the basis for her earnings estimate.

Summary

Bredehoft rehabilitates Arnold's damages methodology, re-establishes the Waldman causal chain, and uses the Aquaman 2 script to show Heard's pre-statement film prospects.

Summary

Defense rests; judge denies Depp's motion to strike Heard's counterclaims; sidebar resolves disputes over six late-identified rebuttal witnesses before jury enters.

Highlights (2)

Summary

Sidebar resolves Dr. Kulber's admissibility as a rebuttal witness; court limits his testimony to the state of Depp's hand after the March 2015 finger surgery.

Highlights (2)

Summary

Rottenborn's brief cross establishes that Depp's March 2015 cast did not prevent use of his uninjured hand, conceded by Kulber.

Summary

Depp's entertainment expert Richard Marks rebuts Kathryn Arnold's damages opinions, challenging her comparable actors, renegotiation assumptions, and $45M earnings projection as lacking factual foundation.

Summary

Nadelhaft pressed Marks on his lack of superhero deal experience and secured admissions that Aquaman was Heard's breakthrough role and $4M her market rate.

Summary

Forensic accountant Spindler testifies Arnold's damages analysis for Heard is methodologically unsupported, and presents Heard's historical earnings as a factual baseline.

Summary

Rottenborn's brief cross confirms Spindler's opinion is limited to rebutting Arnold's calculations and elicits that he has no experience calculating actress defamation damages.

Summary

Recalled expert Doug Bania rebuts Schnell's Twitter analysis and Arnold's comparable-actor claims, concluding neither proved the Waldman statements caused economic harm to Heard.

Summary

Nadelhaft challenges Bania's exact-phrase search methodology, Q score timing inconsistencies, and narrow assignment scope on rebuttal to Schnell and Arnold.

Summary

Judge Azcarate vets Morgan Night's trial exposure before testimony; Night watched one clip about Hicksville and was contacted by Depp's attorneys on May 3rd.

Summary

Bredehoft probes Night's Twitter posts about a Hicksville fire pit incident and his contacts with Depp's attorneys, testing for pretrial contamination before his rebuttal testimony.

Summary

The court heard defense objections to Morgan Night as a rebuttal witness and ruled to allow his limited testimony, finding probative value outweighed any prejudice.

Highlights (2)

Summary

Night, former Hicksville Trailer Palace owner, describes Heard yelling at Depp during their 2013 stay and a broken light fixture found the next morning.

Summary

Bredehoft impeaches Night via his pro-Depp tweet and connection to Depp's first wife, then constrains his testimony to a brief, partial view of the Hicksville visit.

Summary

Vasquez redirects to establish Night was contacted by Depp's team, not the reverse, and testified only to share what he personally observed.

Summary

Stanford psychiatrist Richard Shaw, called by Depp, testified that Heard's expert Dr. Spiegel violated the APA's Goldwater Rule by opining on Depp's personality and cognition without examination.

Summary

Calnan's redirect of psychiatrist Richard Shaw lasted moments: one confirmatory question, a single affirmative answer, and "nothing further."

Highlights (1)

Summary

Defense counsel Nadelhaft proffers excluded testimony and exhibits from nine witnesses and the UK judgment for the appellate record, all barred on hearsay grounds.

Highlights (2)

Summary

Sidebar rulings admit Beverly Leonard for limited impeachment, restrict Kate Moss to staircase testimony, and exclude Dr. Collins and Bryan Neumeister as rebuttal experts.

Highlights (3)

Summary

Kate Moss testifies via WebEx from England, denying Depp ever pushed, kicked, or threw her down any stairs during their 1994–1998 relationship.

Summary

Dr. Curry rebuts Dr. Hughes's expert testimony, challenging her test battery as forensically inappropriate, identifying response distortion Hughes ignored, and concluding Heard has no PTSD.

Summary

Bredehoft attacks Curry's independence and credentials via deposition impeachment, establishing that none of Heard's treating providers ever diagnosed her with BPD or HPD.

Summary

Post-recess sidebar excludes Dr. Collins as rebuttal expert; Neumeister ruling deferred to noon; defense discloses Hughes and Heard as rebuttal witnesses; Depp recalled.

Highlights (3)

Summary

Meyers rehabilitates Depp on Waldman statements, Aquaman role, Australia MDMA claims, honeymoon injury photos, Kate Moss, and Whitney Henriquez.

Summary

The court limited Neumeister's rebuttal testimony to photographs in evidence and their EXIF metadata, denied use of the UK trial judgment, and rejected TMZ's intervention motion.

Highlights (3)

Summary

Rottenborn confronts Depp with pre-train honeymoon photos, post-injury drug texts, a vitriolic text to his agent, and his prior UK trial testimony.

Summary

Meyers rehabilitates Depp on cross-examination exhibits — the Carino text, sister/Aquaman text, and disclaimed DX883 messages — before closing with his direct denial of all physical abuse.

Summary

Former TMZ field manager describes tip-driven coverage of Heard's 2016 courthouse appearance and a shorter cabinet video; he did not identify who supplied either.

Summary

Bredehoft challenged Tremaine's motives and probed whether TMZ's tips about Heard's TRO filing originated from Depp's own legal team.

Summary

Digital forensics expert Neumeister testifies that EXIF metadata in Heard's injury photos shows photo-editing software, making forensic authentication impossible.

Summary

Murphy challenges Neumeister's credentials and uses deposition testimony to limit his opinions on photo editing software and EXIF metadata modification.

Summary

Lecaroz redirected Neumeister to clarify the EXIF/metadata distinction and explain why iTunes backup extractions cannot forensically verify photo provenance.

Summary

Former Sea-Tac Airport employee Beverly Leonard testified by video that in 2009 she witnessed Heard grab and rip a necklace from a traveling companion while appearing intoxicated.

Summary

Bredehoft's brief cross challenged Leonard's credibility, noting she contacted Depp's counsel only the night before testifying—13 years after the 2009 incident.

Summary

Hand surgeon Dr. Richard Gilbert testified that Depp's Australia finger injury is medically consistent with a thrown vodka bottle and inconsistent with Heard's punching account.

Summary

Rottenborn impeaches plaintiff's hand surgeon on the Australia finger injury theory, revealing his hand-movement explanation lacked any evidentiary basis per his own deposition.

Summary

Moniz briefly redirects Gilbert, who clarifies that the absence of other hand injuries makes alternative injury mechanisms—not the thrown bottle—more unlikely.

Summary

Plaintiff rests rebuttal case; Heard's renewed motion to strike denied; jury sketch and jigsaw puzzle housekeeping; defense calls Julian Ackert.

Highlights (1)

Summary

Heard's computer forensics expert rebutted Neumeister's EXIF metadata concerns, finding original iOS-metadata versions of flagged photos on Heard's actual devices.

Summary

Dennison limits Ackert's authentication scope to Neumeister-flagged photos and presents two admitted exhibits with identical metadata but different visual appearance.

Summary

Dr. Dawn Hughes rebuts Shannon Curry's Day 22 criticisms, defending her multi-method forensic methodology, test interpretations, and PTSD conclusions regarding Amber Heard.

Summary

Dennison cross-examines Hughes using test manuals to show she diagnosed PTSD before the CAPS-5 and deviated from PCL-5, CTS-2, and Danger Assessment instructions.

Summary

Brief redirect rehabilitates Hughes on static risk factors, the 88-page notes, and clinical versus research scoring of the CAPS-5.

Summary

Rottenborn's brief rebuttal direct on the counterclaim draws Heard's testimony about daily harassment, death threats, career damage, and lasting psychological trauma from the Waldman statements.

Summary

Judge limits Vasquez's cross of Heard to rebuttal-case topics only, permitting TMZ, Kate Moss, and Baruch but excluding Neumeister photos and Beverly Leonard.

Highlights (3)

Summary

Vasquez closes cross-examination by impeaching Heard on the Hicksville trailer, TMZ courthouse tip-off, the cabinet video leak, and her contradictory attribution of the same floor photograph to two separate incidents.

Summary

Rottenborn's brief redirect rehabilitates Heard on faked-injury allegations and elicits her affirmations of physical, verbal, emotional, and psychological abuse.

Summary

After Heard rests her counterclaim case, the court finalizes contested jury instructions, approves the verdict form, and sets closing argument ground rules for the next morning.

Highlights (2)

Summary

Judge Azcarate reads final jury instructions on defamation elements, actual malice, and damages standards before closing arguments begin.

Highlights (4)

Summary

Depp's attorneys Vasquez and Chew deliver closing argument on the sixth anniversary of Heard's TRO filing, replaying audio admissions and challenging the lack of corroborating injury evidence.

Summary

Rottenborn delivers Heard's closing, arguing the op-ed is First Amendment-protected, Depp cannot meet his burden of proof, and reviewing evidence of alleged abuse chronologically.

Summary

Bredehoft presents Heard's counterclaim closing, arguing Waldman's three statements were defamatory, the May 21 incident was not staged, and seeking career and emotional damages.

Summary

Judge Azcarate delivers final deliberation instructions, releases alternates Jurors 3 and 14, and sends the jury to deliberate in the Depp v. Heard case.

Highlights (4)

Summary

The jury asked whether falsity Question 43 applied to the op-ed headline or the full article; Judge Azcarate clarified it refers to the headline only.

Highlights (3)

Summary

The jury unanimously finds for Depp on all three defamation claims ($10M compensatory, $5M punitive) and for Heard on one counterclaim ($2M); judge caps punitive at $350K.

Highlights (3)