Depp v. Heard Transcript Shannon Curry
Depp v. Heard / Day 9 / April 26, 2022
4 pages · 3 witnesses · 2,825 lines
Day 9: island manager Tara Roberts corroborated a December 2015 Bahamas altercation, forensic psychologist Shannon Curry diagnosed Heard with BPD and found no PTSD, and LAPD Officer Saenz testified she observed no injuries on May 21, 2016.
Procedural
1 1:14:27

THE COURT: All right. Thank you. All right. Your next witness.

2 1:14:34

MS. CALNAN: Dr. Shannon Curry.

3 1:14:36

THE COURT: Doctor who?

4 1:14:38

MS. CALNAN: Shannon Curry.

5 1:14:41

THE COURT: Is it C-U-R-R-Y.

6 1:14:57

THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.

7 1:15:34

COURT CLERK: The witness will be with us momentarily.

8 1:16:11

MS. CALNAN: C-U-R-R-Y, yes. Being first duly sworn, was examined SHANNON CURRY, and testified as follows:

9 1:16:48

THE COURT: Allright.

10

[SECTION HEADER]: EXAMINATION BY COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT AND

11 1:17:25

MR. DENNISON: Good morning, Dr. Curry.

12 1:17:27

DR. CURRY: Good morning.

13 1:17:29

MR. DENNISON: I'm Wayne Dennison. Could you state your full name for the record?

14 1:17:33

DR. CURRY: Shannon Curry.

15 1:17:35

MR. DENNISON: What do you do for a living?

16 1:17:37

DR. CURRY: I am a clinical and forensic psychologist.

17 1:17:44

MR. DENNISON: What's your educational background?

18 1:17:46

DR. CURRY: I received - well, I started college at Georgetown University. I then transferred to I I the University of California Irvine, where I received my bachelor's degree in psychology and social behavior. I completed my master's degree in psychology at the - at Pepperdine University.

19 1:18:04

DR. CURRY: IS I I went on to complete my doctoral degree in clinical psychology at Pepperdine University, which included several training rotations at different practicum sites; those are essentially clinical rotations we do to learn various types of psychology. You learn how to do psychological assessment, counseling, et cetera, and you do that in a variety of different settings. And then I completed a year-long doctoral internship at an American Psychological Association-accredited doctoral internship. You do this a year before you get your degree.

20 1:18:38

DR. CURRY: And that was at Tripler Army Medical Center. It's traditionally a military internship. They did admit two civilians; I was lucky enough to be one of them. I then completed two years of postdoctoral training at Hawaii State Hospital, a locked forensic psychology facility, and that's where you essentially have individuals with severe mental illness who have committed crimes.

21 1:19:02

MR. DENNISON: Have you done any additional coursework or educational work?

22 1:19:07

DR. CURRY: I have. So after I completed my doctorate and my postdoctoral training, I obtained a -- it's called a postdoctoral master of science degree in clinical psychopharmacology. That is for partial fulfillment of prescription privileges, meaning that it's part of what we need to be able to prescribe medication as psychologists because psychologists don't traditionally prescribe, and we can do that with certain military jurisdictions in other states.

23 1:19:36

DR. CURRY: I also obtained advanced training in the Gottman method of couples therapy. I completed all three levels of training, and then I'm also a Gottman educator for several workshops involving helping,parents learn how to prepare to bring their baby home and helping couples without serious problems improve their relationships.

24 1:19:58

MR. DENNISON: What's the Gottman method?

25 1:20:00

DR. CURRY: The Gottman method is a highly research-based method of couple's therapy. It's very structured, so different than what many people expect when they think about couples therapy. I always tell me clients I don't want them to come in, just tell each other all their problems, and then have an awkward, silent drive home. In this therapy, they come in, they complete a really structured assessment in the beginning, so they complete a bunch of questions.

26 1:20:26

DR. CURRY: It gives me a ton of information about their relationship before we even get started and really identifies the areas we're going to target with structured interventions during each session. I think of it almost like a class.

27 1:20:41

MR. DENNISON: Okay. Did you get, in the course of your education, any specialized training?

28 1:20:47

DR. CURRY: Any what?

29 1:20:49

MR. DENNISON: Specialized training.

30 1:20:50

DR. CURRY: I did So my internship specifically was dedicated to essentially working with I post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic stress lot of my training has been with psychological assessment and testing, and then my training during practicum and then in my postdoctoral work was dedicated to working with trauma populations and also conducting forensic psychological assessments.

31 1:21:21

DR. CURRY: Oftentimes -- forensic psychological assessments actually refers to doing testing and an interview and a couple other things for purposes related to law. So it's the application of psychology to the courts, to legal issues. And sometimes that also involves doing assessments for the military to determine whether somebody has sustained a mental disability after combat.

32 1:21:48

MR. DENNISON: You indicated that you did some work at Tripler. What's Tripler? And what's the work you did?

33 1:21:54

DR. CURRY: So Tripler Army Medical Center is a I hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii, if anybody's ever gotten to have a vacation in Hawaii, it's in a giant pink building there And it's one of the g p g top training sites for military psychologists I was very, very lucky to be able to train there They have wonderful funding and a lot of new research going on, particularly for PTSD, but really for all areas of mental health.

34 1:22:20

DR. CURRY: While I was there, I did rotations in family psychology, so doing family therapy, I worked with children. But I also did a neuropsychology rotation learning really the ins and outs of advanced psychological assessment, identifying not just mental issues, mental - sort of mental illness, but also traumatic brain injuries after trauma and doing those PTSD evaluations and then also working with service members who were struggling with a whole host of issues, military stressors, normal life stressors, and then also those who sustained tremendous trauma from combat

35 1:23:02

MR. DENNISON: Do you still continue to work with the military?

36 1:23:04

DR. CURRY: I do Actually our practice - my practice is very focused on military service members, veterans, and their families

37 1:23:19

MR. DENNISON: Okay. What work have you done in prior litigation matters?

38 1:23:27

DR. CURRY: Well, most of my litigation -- if we're talking about civil work, that has mostly been reports, so this is my first time testifying in a civil matter. The majority of my forensic work has been in criminal law or providing O :::::,:,::: ::.::;, :;;,::t'" reviewed by a judge, and a determination is made or usually there's a settlement beforehand.

39 1:23:56

MR. DENNISON: Okay. Do you work in connection with any particular courts?

40 1:24:03

DR. CURRY: I do. So I'm actually not sure if I'm on the list anymore in Honolulu, but I'm a certified forensic evaluator for the State of Hawaii, which means that I have been appointed by the Court to conduct evaluations for matters that are presented, and then I'm also on the list of forensic evaluators in several courts in Southern California. And then I'm also -- I am contracted by the military, Department of Defense, now again for evaluations of PTSD of service members.

41 1:24:37

MR. DENNISON: Okay. You mentioned PTSD a couple of times now.

42 1:24:39

DR. CURRY: Yes.

43 1:24:41

MR. DENNISON: What are you referring to there?

44 1:24:44

DR. CURRY: So PTSD is a mental illness. It can develop after a person has been exposed to a traumatic event, and our Diagnostic Statistical Manual, the DSM, is sort of the authoritative manual of mental illnesses. It's considered our bible of mental illness. We go there for diagnoses.

45 1:25:05

DR. CURRY: And according to that, there's a specific type of trauma that a person must experience for them to be able to qualify for a diagnosis of PTSD. And that's an event that is life-threatening. It can also involve sexual assault, and you can experience that either directly, but you can also be traumatized if you've seen it happen to somebody else or if it's happened unexpectedly or violently to somebody close to you, a family member or a friend. And then there's also a provision for people who are first responders. If they're encountering really traumatic information regularly, that qualifies as a trauma. Now, there are a number of symptoms that can develop.

46 1:25:51

MR. DENNISON: We'll talk about that -- I I JO '::Ue morn

47 1:25:54

DR. CURRY: Okay.

48 1:25:54

MR. DENNISON: Do you hold any credentials relevant to ! 13 the work that you do?

49 1:25:58

DR. CURRY: Well, I am a licensed psychologist.

50 1:26:02

MR. DENNISON: Where?

51 1:26:03

DR. CURRY: In California and Hawaii.

52 1:26:05

MR. DENNISON: Okay. Any other certifications or other credentials?

53 1:26:10

DR. CURRY: Not that I can think of off the top of my head other than the training with the Gottman method of couples therapy.

54 1:26:19

MR. DENNISON: Okay. Have you worked with the Hawaii Department of Courts and Corrections?

55 1:26:25

DR. CURRY: Yes, I have.

56 1:26:26

MR. DENNISON: In what capacity?

57 1:26:28

DR. CURRY: Well, I am -- so that, I guess, would be a credential. So I am a certified forensic evaluator for the State of Hawaii.

58 1:26:41

MR. DENNISON: In connection with your doctorate, was there a research component?

59 1:26:46

DR. CURRY: There was. So would you like me to tell you about it?

60 1:26:50

MR. DENNISON: Yes, please.

61 1:26:50

DR. CURRY: Okay. So I conducted a research study while I was at Pepperdine completing my doctorate. It's called a dissertation, so when you're obtaining your doctorate, you contribute something to the scientific field that you're in. And typically that involves doing what we call "novel science," so you're doing an experiment. You're finding out new information and helping the field progress.

62 1:27:11

DR. CURRY: So I did research in Peru, and I was essentially looking at the effectiveness of the therapy intervention there for kids who were growing up in this community called Ayacucho which was exposed to years of guerrilla warfare, the longest guerrilla war in the history of the world. And there were a lot of issues in that community, tremendous trauma, and my research was around finding interventions that were really effective for that community.

63 1:27:41

MR. DENNISON: Where do you work now?

64 1:27:43

DR. CURRY: I work for the Curry Psychology Group.

65 1:27:46

MR. DENNISON: And what does the Curry Psychology Group do?

66 1:27:49

DR. CURRY: We're a multispecialty mental health center, so we have neuropsychologists who do testing of kids. We have therapists, individual therapist, couples therapists, family therapists. We even have a meditation teacher. We basically try to meet the needs of our community, and we highly specialize in working with military personnel and their families.

67 1:28:09

MR. DENNISON: Who's the Curry in Curry Psychology Group?

68 1:28:13

DR. CURRY: I'm Dr. Curry.

69 1:28:16

MR. DENNISON: How many people work for you?

70 1:28:18

DR. CURRY: As of right now, I believe it's 13.

71 1:28:25

MR. DENNISON: Okay. How long have you been doing this kind of work?

72 1:28:28

DR. CURRY: For about 15 years.

73 1:28:30

MR. DENNISON: How much of your therapy practice focuses on treating individuals?

74 1:28:36

DR. CURRY: I would say about half of it is individuals, half is couples.

75 1:28:41

MR. DENNISON: Okay. Do you do any training of students?

76 1:28:46

DR. CURRY: I do.

77 1:28:47

MR. DENNISON: What's that?

78 1:28:48

DR. CURRY: So we have several unlicensed professionals at our office, and they're earning their additional hours so that they can get licensed. So they're able to see clients, and I meet with them regularly to supervise them; discuss their cases; provide them with information about different diagnoses, interventions, and treatment methods.

79 1:29:10

MR. DENNISON: How did you get involved in this case?

80 1:29:13

DR. CURRY: I was contacted by Ms. Camille Vasquez, one of the attorneys for Mr. Depp.

81 1:29:18

MR. DENNISON: Okay. And what was the nature of the contact?

82 1:29:23

DR. CURRY: Ms. Vasquez called me and indicated I 8 that she might be interested in having me meet the legal team so that I could discuss my expertise and possibly provide my opinions related to the IO matter.

83 1:29:34

MR. DENNISON: Okay. What were you asked to provide expert opinion on?

84 1:29:40

DR. CURRY: So initially, my role that I understood at the time was to review the case materials and provide my opinions regarding anything that I noticed that was consistent or even inconsistent with the psychological science that exists today on intimate partner violence in Mr. Depp's and Ms. Heard's relationship.

85 1:30:02

MR. DENNISON: You used a phrase there, "intimate partner violence." What are you talking about?

86 1:30:07

DR. CURRY: So there are a multitude of different definitions depending on the source or the state. But essentially intimate partner violence is abuse. It can be physical, psychological, and it's from one partner to another in an intimate relationship.

87 1:30:25

MR. DENNISON: Okay. Did your role in this case evolve over time?

88 1:30:32

DR. CURRY: Yes. It shifted. So I was retained at the end of January 2021 and then had just barely .1 O begun to review the documents. The case was postponed, and then in October 2021, I was asked by counsel to provide a psychological evaluation of Ms. Heard.

89 1:31:04

MR. DENNISON: Okay. Were you ever asked to do a psychological evaluation of Mr. Depp?

90 1:31:11
91 1:31:14

THE COURT: Okay.

92 1:31:17

MR. DENNISON: What types of documents did you consider in this analysis?

93 1:31:21

DR. CURRY: So I reviewed quite a few documents as part of my evaluation. That included all of the case documents: Ms. Heard's medical records by Dr. Kipper, her prior mental health treatment records, I believe I reviewed records from Dr. Amy Banks, Dr. Bonnie Jacobs, Dr. Connell Cowan. And also a significant portion of my review involved notes from nurse Erin Falati, at the time Erin Boerum, who spent a significant time with Ms. Heard in her direct company.

94 1:32:00

DR. CURRY: I also viewed exhibits, quite a few audio recordings, a video recording - several video recordings or possibly photographs; I might be getting them confused - and multiple witness statements, testimony, and declarations.

95 1:32:17

MR. DENNISON: Did there come a time when you met directly with Ms. Heard?

96 1:32:20

DR. CURRY: Yes, I did So in conducting my evaluation, I met with Ms. Heard on two separate dates: December 10th and December 17th, 2021.

97 1:32:30

MR. DENNISON: Approximately how much time have you spent with Ms. Heard?

98 1:32:33

DR. CURRY: So the evaluation - we spent 12 hours directly with one another; however, there were more - there were more hours involved in the evaluation with some breaks. So we spent seven hours together on the first day, December 10th. Not necessarily together because there was a one-hour lunch break and about a half hour with breaks split up through the day. And then on the 17th, we spent a little more than eight hours in the evaluation from start to finish with a one-hour break and another half hour of breaks distributed throughout the day.

99 1:33:04

MR. DENNISON: As a result of the work that you performed, did you form any opinions with respect to Ms. Heard?

100 1:33:11

DR. CURRY: I did.

101 1:33:12

MR. DENNISON: What were those opinions?

102 1:33:15

DR. CURRY: The results of Ms. Heard's evaluation supported two diagnoses: Borderline personality disorder and histrionic personality disorder.

103 1:33:25

MR. DENNISON: What is a diagnosis?

104 1:33:29

DR. CURRY: Diagnosis is a way that we essentially - that psychologists, psychiatrists, anybody in the mental health field thinks about a disorder. It helps us to communicate a set of symptoms that a person's experiencing, and along with that set of symptoms, it tells other professionals a lot about how those symptoms might have developed, how that person might behave, perceive the world. It also drives treatment. The real purpose is to determine what sort of interventions will be most effective for the person.

105 1:34:03

MR. DENNISON: Previously you made reference to I think you called it the DSM-5.

106 1:34:05

DR. CURRY: Yes.

107 1:34:07

MR. DENNISON: What's that? IB

108 1:34:09

DR. CURRY: So the DSM-5, that stands for the Diagnostic Statistical Manual, Version 5, and that contains every diagnosis we use in mental health, and we -- it's the authoritative manual of mental diagnoses.

109 1:34:29

MR. DENNISON: Is performing diagnoses something you I typically do in your line of work?

110 1:34:34

DR. CURRY: Yes.

111 1:34:35

MR. DENNISON: Thank you. So you referenced two personality disorders. What's a personality ' I disorder?

112 1:34:46

DR. CURRY: To understand a personality disorder, I think it could be helpful for us to kind of define personality. So personality, something we take for granted but these are the traits, the characteristics, the way we think, we feel, and we act, that make us who we are. And these traits are pretty stable over time and across situations. We might, you know, be sure to mind our Ps and Qs when we're meeting somebody new, but overall if somebody were to describe, or if we were to describe ourself, we have a pretty good sense of who we are. Sometimes an easy way to think of it is imagining how you might describe a brother or sister or a child if you have children; their personalities are pretty clear to you.

113 1:35:30

DR. CURRY: Personality disorder is some sort of dysfunction in those enduring traits, so as opposed to other types of mental illness, when you think about something like depression, that's episodic. It comes and it goes, and when it's treated with medication it can pretty much be completely mitigated or minimized in a person's life, and their personality is still there, separate from the depression.

114 1:35:54

DR. CURRY: When we have a personality disorder, there are going to be disturbances in several different areas that are visible in almost all different facets of their life.

115 1:36:04

MR. DENNISON: Is there a manner which personality disorders are commonly diagnosed?

116 1:36:10

DR. CURRY: Yes. So they can be diagnosed in a treating environment, a treating psychologist or a therapist or a psychiatrist simply does a diagnostic interview which involves assessing multiple areas of a person's history back down through childhood.

117 1:36:25

MR. DENNISON: I'm going to stop you for a second there.

118 1:36:26

DR. CURRY: Yes.

119 1:36:27

MR. DENNISON: What's a treating environment?

120 1:36:29

DR. CURRY: Sometimes I'll slip into these words. I apologize. So a treating environment, in therapy, if somebody is going in for treatment, the mental health provider will ask them questions to find out what sort of symptoms they've experienced and what sort of things have occurred in their life that might be consistent with these disorders or rule out those disorders, prove that there's no reason for these disorders to be considered. They might also pay attention to their observations of the client over time and new information the client provides them.

121 1:37:00

DR. CURRY: The most reliable way, however, to ever come about a diagnosis really is through a comprehensive psychological assessment. And I might use the words "assessment," "examination,"

122 1:37:37

DR. CURRY: P , differently.

123 1:37:38

DR. CURRY: You integrate that with the same interview I was telling you that people would do for therapy. We do that as well. And then in a courtroom setting, you're going to look at all the legal records, all of those documents, corroborating information, to sort of check your hypotheses that may be developing and also check against the examinee's statements to confirm O whether you have enough evidence on of a certain diagnosis.

124 1:38:05

MR. DENNISON: So what's a clinical interview?

125 1:38:07

DR. CURRY: Clinical interview is a very comprehensive interview. It includes a person's entire life history as well as very specifically looks at any symptoms they might have. This can start as far back as birth. You might find out if there were any issues with their delivery, any genetic issues, any intellectual issues. How did they do - what was their home life like? How was discipline handled? What's their relationship with their primary caregivers? Were they raised by an aunt, an uncle, their parents? How many siblings do they have? How do they get along with their siblings? How many times did they have to move? Was there any abuse? Did they have any really significant life experiences that come to mind when they think about their childhood? How were they as a student? Did they need special services? Did they get in trouble in school?

126 1:38:56

DR. CURRY: And you do this. You continue on to high school. Were there hobbies? Did they play sports? How many friends did they have? Did they have any trouble keeping those friendships? Then you get into adulthood. Did they go to college? Did they not go to college? How come? What sorts of jobs have they held? How did those jobs go? How did they end? That's an important question. What sort of romantic relationships have they been involved in? How do they identify sexually? culturally? Let's see. What else? What sort of symptoms have they experienced?

127 1:39:28

DR. CURRY: You go through the entire gamut of some of the main symptoms. You might screen for depression, any disorganized thinking, that means thinking that isn't necessarily in touch with reality, and any current

128 1:39:40

MR. DENNISON: How did you conclude that Ms. Heard distress they may be having today. suffers from the personality disorders that you identified?

129 1:39:50

DR. CURRY: So there was information that supported it from multiple sources. I conducted testing including - one of the main tests that I used, she obtained scores that were consistent with those diagnoses, and then I also - there was evidence of those diagnoses in her records and in her self-report.

130 1:40:13
131 1:40:14

THE COURT: Counsel, why don't we just go ahead and pause for a second? Why don't we go ahead and take our morning recess? Okay.

132 1:40:19

THE COURT: Ladies and gentlemen, we're going to go ahead and take our 15-minute morning recess. Do not discuss the case and do not do any outside research, okay?

133 1:40:27

THE COURT: L\.MR. DENNISON: Your Honor, when would you like to reconvene?

134 1:40:35

THE COURT: Give me a moment, sir.

135

[STAGE DIRECTION]: (Whereupon, the jury exited the courtroom and the following proceedings took place.)

136 1:40:54

THE COURT: All right. Doctor, since you're on the stand now, do not discuss your testimony with anybody to include the attorneys at thus time.

137 1:40:58

THE COURT: Okay. Let's go ahead and come back at 11 :45, okay?

138 1:44:14

THE COURT: L\.MR. DENNISON: Thank you, Your Honor.

139 1:47:29

THE COURT: Okay.

140 1:50:44

COURT BAILIFF: All rise.

141

[STAGE DIRECTION]: (Recess taken from 11:27 a.m. to 11:46 a.m.)

142 1:54:00

COURT BAILIFF: All rise. Please be seated and come to order.

143 1:57:15

THE COURT: All right. Ready for the jury?

144 1:58:59

MR. DENNISON: Yes, Your Honor.

145 2:00:42

THE COURT: Okay.

146 2:01:16

THE COURT: All right. You may have your seat. And your next question, sir. I 9

147

[STAGE DIRECTION]: (Whereupon, the jury entered the courtroom and the following proceedings took place.)

148 2:01:21

MR. DENNISON: Thank you, Your Honor.

149

[SECTION HEADER]: BY MR. DENNISON:

150 2:01:24

MR. DENNISON: Dr. Curry, before the break, you were talking about some of the factors that you considered in determining whether Ms. Heard suffers from personality disorders. One of them, I think the last one you said before we left, was self-report. What do you mean by that?

151 2:01:41

DR. CURRY: So the self-report would be things that Ms. Heard indicated to me specifically. So there were a couple of characteristics that she noted in her self-report that were consistent with these personality disorders. The first was actually my own behavioral observations of her based on her self-report. So one of the hallmark characteristics of histrionic borderline - sorry - histrionic personality disorder is sort of a overly dramatic presentation. It's called this impressionistic speech, so it tends to be very flowery. It uses a lot of descriptive words like "magical," "wonderful," and it can go on for quite some time. And yet it really lacks any substance. So at the end you're left wondering what was just said or what the answer is to the actual question.

152 2:02:35

DR. CURRY: So that occurred a number of times, and it also represented the quick shifts you'll see between emotions. So she would suddenly be one way, and then she would become very animated or very sad, and when people are displaying these emotions with this personality disorder, there's a sense of shallowness to it. People who are observing them will feel like it's always playacting, and they might not be able to put their finger on it, but part of it is because of the rapidness with which the person can switch emotions and also the lack of substance. They don't really refer to "I feel this way." They might describe emotions. They might describe events, but very rarely, and Ms. Heard did not say, "I feel vulnerable." She never really indicated a vulnerable feeling of her own.

153 2:03:29

DR. CURRY: Then the substance of her self-report, so when I was asking her information about her history --

154 2:03:35

MR. DENNISON: We're going to ask more about that later. I was just trying to get a sense of what a self-report was.

155 2:03:40

DR. CURRY: Oh, okay.

156 2:03:43

MR. DENNISON: What psychological tests did you perform?

157 2:03:44

DR. CURRY: Okay. So psychological tests, I -- I'll just go in order. So first of all, I asked her a couple questions from something called the Mini-Mental Status Exam [sic]. That's really just a fancy way of saying that I wanted to make sure that she was alert and oriented to we call it person, place, and time. That means she knew who she was. She knew who I was. She knew where we were, and she knew the date. That way I can ensure that she's able to participate in the evaluation and understand what's happening.

158 2:04:14

DR. CURRY: I then administered something called the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. The 2 means that it's the second edition. And this is something we call an objective measure. So it asks 567 questions, or statements, and the person either agrees or disagrees with them how much this statement represents them. And this test has been around since 1943. There are more than 10,000 studies showing that it is appropriate for determining somebody's personality traits.

159 2:04:52

DR. CURRY: It measures all of those things I sort of mentioned: How a person thinks, feels, and behaves in multiple different aspects of their lives. It also measures very accurately any signs of mental illness or dysfunction.

160 2:05:05

DR. CURRY: And the reason I also really like this test, whenever you're using a test for an evaluation that's going to be used in a forensic setting, people have a lot of incentive to present themselves in a way that's going to benefit their case. And they may want to look like they're sicker than they really are. They may want to look much healthier than they really are, and some of those incentives, they may not even realize that they're intending to do that. So it can be conscious or unconscious, but you really need to have a test that can check for that.

161 2:05:41

DR. CURRY: And the MMPI-2 has a set of validity scales, we call them These are scales that measure, really, the truthfulness and accuracy with which a person is approaching the test. And these scales on this particular test have been so well researched over many decades that they've been nuanced, and they can tell us a lot about if somebody's, for instance, exaggerating. Are they elevating one of the scales that shows that they're exaggerating on purpose? Are they exaggerating in a manner that's more like a cry for help?

162 2:06:15

DR. CURRY: Are they exaggerating in a manner that's clever and sophisticated or more obvious? And then the same exact thing goes for trying to minimize symptoms. We have a number of scales that can show us all the different - if somebody's trying to say they're the most wonderful person on Earth or trying to deny problems and if they're doing that, again, in a very clever way or more of an obvious way.

163 2:06:36

DR. CURRY: So that test was my choice for this case. There's one other reason I'd like to add is that part of my evaluation was - one of the reasons was to assess whether Ms. Heard has post-traumatic stress disorder, which I told you about earlier, as a result of the incidents that these allegedly occurred by Mr. Depp. And that's a really tough disorder to find out if somebody's faking it or not. It's one of the most easily faked disorders.

164 2:07:07

DR. CURRY: Most of us know what it feels like to feel anxious, and a lot of people have seen war movies and movies that depict somebody having PTSD. In fact, some research has shown that if you give someone a diagnostic checklist of things that show that you have PTSD, they can do it 96 percent of the time, just someone on the street.

165 2:07:24

DR. CURRY: So you really need a test that's very sensitive to that, and MMPI-2 has been shown in multiple studies to be excellent at detecting those attempts.

166 2:07:34

MR. DENNISON: Okay. You keep using "MMPI-2." That's the abbreviation that you folks use for ...

167 2:07:41

DR. CURRY: The -- I'm sorry if I hadn't said that. That's the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory.

168 2:07:50

MR. DENNISON: Okay. What other psychological testing did you perform?

169 2:07:53

DR. CURRY: So I also performed the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale dash 5, and that dash 5 makes it to the diagnosis for PTSD in our current diagnostic manual, the fifth version. To do that test, you first administer something called the life events checklist, and the life events checklist -- both of these tests, by the way, were developed by the National Center for PTSD with the Department of Veterans Affairs. But the life events checklist lists 16 different very stressful life events that people can go through that are often -- can be associated with developing PTSD. And then it also has a 17th item that you can fill in if you feel like you've been through something really difficult that wasn't included.

170 2:08:40

DR. CURRY: Now, I like to also add something called the life events checklist 5 interview which digs a little bit deeper into the person's childhood as well to find out if they -- what sort of -- there are so many different things that can be difficult growing up. And also it's very important that you have the person determine which of the events they've listed -- let's say they have a number of different types of traumas -- which one do they feel like was the most traumatic for them? Which one still causes them to feel distressed when they talk about it? And sometimes they can't just identify one.

171 2:09:15

DR. CURRY: And then that has -- that leads to your next decision. So if they have multiple different similar types of events, like seeing combat, then you might use that as the worst one, the multiple similar. So that looks like you describe an anchor, we call it, to do the testing, and we I! Is would maybe describe the anchor as "the worst of my combat experience," okay?

172 2:09:42

DR. CURRY: Now, if somebody had multiple different traumas from different times in their life, like childhood abuse, and then went to combat and had some horrible things happen there, you would do the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale test, the one that comes after, you do one for the childhood event and a separate one for the adulthood event

173 2:10:03

MR. DENNISON: Does this Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale have a handy abbreviation?

174 2:10:09

DR. CURRY: It does. We'll call it the CAPS-5. That's actually what it goes by.

175 2:10:18

MR. DENNISON: Okay. How common is the use of the MPPI -- MMPI-2, in your profession?

176 2:10:25

DR. CURRY: The MMPI-2 is actually the most commonly used assessment worldwide by mental health professionals and in forensic settings for g the Court. 1! excellent validity in those settings across

177 2:10:35

MR. DENNISON: Why do you use it?

178 2:10:36

DR. CURRY: I use it for that purpose and for its genders, across ethnicities, for different reasons, and when I keep saying "validity," by the way, what I mean is accuracy or -- and I'll try to work that in, but then also for detecting the accuracy with which a person reports PTSD.

179 2:10:58

MR. DENNISON: Okay. Is that scaled in some way?

180 2:11:02

DR. CURRY: I'm sorry. What was that?

181 2:11:03

MR. DENNISON: Does that make use of a scale in some way?

182 2:11:07

DR. CURRY: The MMPI-2? Do you mean specifically for PTSD?

183 2:11:10
184 2:11:11

DR. CURRY: There's actually a combination of scales you want to look for. You would never make the diagnosis just based on one scale alone or even on the test alone. You'd integrate other data.

185 2:11:21

MR. DENNISON: All right. How did you administer the

186 2:11:27

DR. CURRY: I provided her the test on an iPad MMPI-2 to Ms. Heard? She essentially had her own little desk area and then an iPad. She hit start It provides her with the instructions, and then the - it gives her 567 statements in order. For each one she taps "true" or "false."

187 2:11:45

MR. DENNISON: What did you learn about Ms. Heard from the results of the MMPI-2?

188 2:11:50

DR. CURRY: Quite a bit. I wrote up a 25-page interpretation outline. It has numerous, numerous scales. So one of the reasons I like this measure so much is that it can tell you so much about multiple different traits and tendencies and mental issues.

189 2:12:10

DR. CURRY: One of the primary things I learned was that she had a very sophisticated way of minimizing any personal problems. I also learned that she tends to - well, there were a number of characteristics that were consistent with the eventual diagnoses, but some of the primary characteristics - I'm going to try to condense 25 pages here -- were essentially externalization of blame, tending to have a lot of inner hostility that is attempted to be controlled, a tendency to be very self-righteous but to also deny that self-righteousness and to judge others critically against these sort of high standards for moral value, but also to deny doing that. Essentially to claim that one is very nonjudgmental and accepting and yet very full of rage, really.

190 2:13:13

DR. CURRY: And these aren't facts, but her scores essentially correlated, so they were consistent with other people who obtained these scores who have been shown through many, many, many studies to have these very specific traits.

191 2:13:28

DR. CURRY: So externalization of blame, a lot of inner anger and hostility. Sometimes that anger, among these groups with similar scores, these people might have that anger kind of explode out at times. They tend to be very passive-aggressive. They may be self-indulgent, very self-centered. They could use manipulation tactics to try to get their needs met, very needy of attention, acceptance, approval. They tend to distance people who are close to them. Initially they may seem very charming; they're very socially sophisticated actually; that was a major component on there. They have a capacity to kind of offer some of their faults, but in a way -- but only the ones that people think of lightly and can all relate to. And so they can present as very fair and balanced, but in actuality, they really might be very judgmental of others and unaware of problems in their behavior and their thinking. So after you provide the examination So once they've completed the test, you can have it scored by the computer immediately. It's a very, very complex test to interpret, but right away, you'll get a list of what's called "critical items," and these are just some -- a couple of the items, the statements that are presented that were more clearly symptom based, and I always follow up with the examinee. Some of these might have to do with suicide. Some of them have to do with other symptoms that you'd just like to get a little bit more information on because sometimes an examinee might tell you they're fine when you're doing your interview with them and they have no symptoms, and then when they take the test, it says that they're having trouble sleeping or they struggle with nausea all the time or they feel very anxious, so you want to follow up on that.

192 2:15:33

MR. DENNISON: Okay. What's a code type?

193 2:15:37

DR. CURRY: A code type, let me think of how to explain this very, very simply. So the main scales, I keep referring to "scales." These are just the main scores that come up on this test, we can refer to them as codes. And when I was saying that Ms. Heard's scores could be compared to certain groups of people that had been researched before and obtained similar scores, the research has shown that certain people will have certain scores that kind of spike on us, okay?

194 2:16:11

DR. CURRY: And so all of those traits that I was describing, those are traits found in these code types. So it means that Number 2, score number 2 was high, and score Number 6 was high. And so if we have those two scores were both high, then that's a 2-6 code type, and the code type -- s

195 2:16:31

MR. DENNISON: What code type was Ms. Heard?

196 2:16:33

DR. CURRY: Ms. Heard had -- the clearest code type was 3-6, but then she also had some other code types that were less significant.

197 2:16:43

MR. DENNISON: What characteristics are associated with a 3-6 code type?

198 2:16:50

DR. CURRY: So a 3-6 code type, a lot of that anger is expressed in this code type. There can be actually a lot of cruelty. Usually with people who are less powerful, actually, when you see this code type, you want to, if you can, to follow up with subordinates, co-workers, people who may have observed their behavior more closely.

199 2:17:13

DR. CURRY: The 3-6 code type is very concerned with their image, very attention seeking, very prone to externalizing blame to a point where it's unclear whether they can even admit to themselves that they do have responsibility in certain areas.

200 2:17:36

DR. CURRY: Lot of suppressed and denied anger, but the anger is very present, will explode out, and a lot of issues in their close relationships.

201 2:17:46

MR. DENNISON: How does Ms. Beard's code type fit in with your overall opinion as to personality disorders?

202 2:17:54

DR. CURRY: Well, this might be an appropriate time to describe a little bit about these personality disorders because I think what you'll hear is that there's a lot of consistency there.

203 2:18:04

DR. CURRY: So borderline personality disorder is a disorder of stability. It's instability. And it's instability in personal relationships. It's instability in their emotions. It's instability in their behavior, and it's instability in their sense of self and their identity. And that instability is really driven by this underlying terror of abandonment.

204 2:18:30

DR. CURRY: So one of the key features also of this disorder, all of it is like pistons of an engine kind of firing off and igniting one another. But when somebody is afraid of being abandoned by their partner or anybody else in their environment and they have this disorder, they'll make

205 2:18:48

DR. CURRY: Desperate attempts to prevent that from happening. And those desperate attempts could be physical aggression. It could be threatening. It could be harming themselves. But these are behaviors that are usually very extreme and very concerning to the people around them The anger is typically what - sadly, it's counteractive, right? So the thing these people fear most is being abandoned, but over time, the anger, that explosive anger that they've shown when somebody is needing space or when somebody is really not doing anything wrong - because a lot of times they read into things that they perceive as being a slight to them or somebody intending to harm them that actually isn't happening - they'll exaggerate it, and they'll explode, react in this heightened manner that is just exhausting for their partners.

206 2:19:44

DR. CURRY: Oftentimes their partners will try to make them happy at first and really allow themselves to be a punching bag, thinking that they can somehow solve this problem, that somehow they can make this better. And eventually it just overwhelms them.

207 2:20:03

MR. DENNISON: Before we move on --

208 2:20:05

DR. CURRY: Okay.

209 2:20:06

MR. DENNISON: Are you familiar with the term 1 "emotional reactivity"?

210 2:20:09

DR. CURRY: I am.

211 2:20:10

MR. DENNISON: What is that? Histrionic personality disorder is --

212 2:20:12

DR. CURRY: So emotional reactivity is very common in the diagnosis. So essentially, like I said, there's instability in emotions. People with borderline personality disorder are often misdiagnosed as having bipolar disorder because they can be up and down. They can look very depressed, and they can look very elated. But these changes are happening within a matter of hours. Somebody with bipolar disorder, this is a clinical depression lasting days, weeks, a clinical mania where sometimes they even need to be hospitalized because they're so grandiose, they clear out their bank account and go to Vegas and spend it all, they're acting in some very bizarre ways.

213 2:20:52

DR. CURRY: With borderline personality disorder, you're having these fluctuating moods constantly, and again, this hypersensitivity to being slighted or feeling offended really driven by the fear that if you're offended or slighted, if the therapist comes in two minutes late, or if somebody shows up to dinner two minutes late, that they might be abandoning you. And it's not as if the borderline is considering themselves abandoned in that moment, but they just know that they have this overwhelming emotion, and there are no attempts to control that emotion.

214 2:21:26

DR. CURRY: There's no -- there are no attempts to regulate it. So if they're in the middle of the restaurant and they feel offended, they're going to start the fight. People are going to see it, or they might just start crying or break down. But they'll make a lot of accusations, and that reactivity is when you're going to just -- you're y y g g j y going to see a lot of this escalation of bizarre behavior. They can react violently. They can react aggressively. They will often physically prevent their partner from trying to leave if their partner want to get space from all of this intense emotions, and oftentimes they will be abusive to their partners in these situations.

215 2:22:03

DR. CURRY: Sometimes they'll physically restrain them from leaving and become injured that way, but also people with borderline personality disorder, it seems to be a predictive factor for women who implement violence against their partner, and one of the most common tactics that they'll use is actually physically assaulting and then getting harmed themselves. But mostly we call this "administrative violence," the -- essentially this is saying that they'll make threats using the legal system.

216 2:22:34

DR. CURRY: So they might say that they are going to file a restraining order or claim abuse, or they might do these things to essentially try to keep their partner from leaving in the moment.

217 2:22:47

DR. CURRY: Again, they're not consciously thinking, "I'm going to keep my partner from leaving right now." They're just thinking, "I can't stand this. I , hate my partner." They went from idealizing to suddenly devaluing because of the hurt, and they'll do anything to express that big emotion of anger.

218 2:23:03

MR. DENNISON: Your Honor, may we approach?

219 2:23:13

THE COURT: Allright. Yes,sir.

220

[STAGE DIRECTION]: (Sidebar.)

221 2:23:22

MR. DENNISON: Your Honor, I'm going to In ask her about what other parts of her review led I her to make the borderline diagnosis, and among the issues that the witness will testify to is that Ms. Heard made a self-report of arrests. And the issue was raised previously in Motions in Limine. I did not want to raise it in front of ! 19 the Court until I talked with you about it.

222 2:23:32

MS. BREDEHOFT: Your Honor, Ms. Heard arrest -- charges were dropped in 2000 --

223 2:23:41

THE COURT: I think it's highly prejudicial, so I'm not going to allow that. Do you think you can do that without informing your witness not to ...

224 2:23:50
225 2:24:00

THE COURT: Okay.

226 2:24:09

MR. DENNISON: Thank you.

227

[STAGE DIRECTION]: (Open court.)

228

[SECTION HEADER]: BY MR. DENNISON:

229 2:24:18

MR. DENNISON: Okay. You indicated -- you were talking about emotional reactivity. What, if any, emotional reactivity did you observe in your review? And Jet's do this one at a time.

230 2:24:36

DR. CURRY: Okay. So there were a couple indications to me. First, I can sort of think about it with the treatment record. So particularly, Dr. Cowan Connell - am I getting it right? I feel like for some reason in my mind, I might have just reversed it - but Dr. Cowan's records - I did reverse it - he actually refers to this reactivity quite a bit and to Ms. Heard's temper, and that temper is often branded, or being hotheaded, is really characteristic of borderline personality disorder, as is their very charming, personable nature. This is a disorder of contradictions.

231 2:25:24

DR. CURRY: In Nurse Falati's notes, she had -- I thought there was something interesting. She references a night when they're out to dinner, I believe in London, and she provided positive reinforcement to Ms. Heard because Ms. Heard had been disappointed by a mistake made by the server, and it sort of references how previously she might have criticized the server, become upset by that and that she didn't this time and so that that had been some sort of a step forward.

232 2:25:59

DR. CURRY: And there was also an indication, actually, in Dr. Hughes's -- Dr. Hughes is a forensic psychologist who had been appointed by Ms. Heard to conduct an evaluation as well. In Ms. Hughes's [sic] interview of Ms. Heard, Ms. Heard disclosed that she had cut her arm in the past, which is a typical reactive-type thing somebody with this diagnosis can do. It's one of the symptoms.

233 2:26:25

DR. CURRY: And that's sort of all I can think of top of my mind from the treatment records.

234 2:26:29

DR. CURRY: Moving into some of the declarations, or deposition testimony, what struck me was Ms. Raquel Pennington's testimony. She's a former friend of Ms. Heard's, and she indicated -- she told a story about I suppose that they were shopping for Thanksgiving accoutrements, something to prepare for Thanksgiving, and Ms.

235 2:26:52

DR. CURRY: Heard struck her in the face sort of out of the blue, which is -- I thought was interesting because that is one of those signs of borderline personality disorder where if a friend or loved one isn't meeting your needs in that moment, borderline -- people with borderline personality disorder can be really caring in their relationships as long as their needs are being met. They feel that their needs to be met when they want them met at a specific level, and if they're not, then that anger, that sense of harm causes them to react.

236 2:27:29

DR. CURRY: So the striking Ms. Pennington, per Ms. Pennington's report in the declaration -- or the testimony, I thought, was pretty consistent. And then Ms. Heard's own self-description -

237 2:27:40

MR. DENNISON: Okay. I'm going to ask you a question about--

238 2:27:44

DR. CURRY: Sure.

239 2:27:47

MR. DENNISON: You indicated Ms. Pennington was a former friend --

240 2:27:50

DR. CURRY: Yes.

241 2:27:52

MR. DENNISON: Of Ms. Heard. Is there a relationship between borderline personality disorder and intimate relationships?

242 2:28:01

DR. CURRY: Yes. So the instability definitely translates to their relationships. You'll see relationships start very intensely. People will - somebody with borderline personality disorder sees the relationship as extremely close. This pattern of idealizing and devaluing is definitely displayed. They do this with their lovers and also with their friends, and so this might be the perfect person, their perfect soul mate friend, perfect soul mate partner, and their engagement in the relationship is very alluring, I very charming to the other person, and so initially everything seems great But what occurs is that reality sets in. People are not perfect, even when we have a lot in common with them. Whereas most of us can accept somebody as a whole, somebody who has a little bit of flaws and still thinks, "This is my great friend who always is constantly running late for dinner," the person with borderline personality disorder, things are in these extremes, this black-and-white call it splitting. And so that person goes from being idealized, the perfect person, to dumpster. They are totally devalued. "They are the worst friend. They don't care anything about me.

243 2:29:14

DR. CURRY: I have better people around. And then there will be a repair because the person with this disorder does feel remorseful after they have these reactions, angry, tell their friend off. But over time, it wears away at these relationships, and so what you'll usually see is many, many transitions in their friendships over the years, people who have sort of fallen by the wayside who were really very close-knit at one time, and then -- but there's not a lot of consistency in the long-term. You'll also see that intimate relationships, many, many relationships, but none that are particularly long-term.

244 2:29:55

MR. DENNISON: How does borderline personality disorder relate to identity issues?

245 2:30:01

DR. CURRY: So, again, that instability also travels toward identity. When I was describing personality earlier, I was talking a little bit about those traits we have that help us know who we are. When you have borderline personality disorder, that actually is not something you understand.

246 2:30:19

DR. CURRY: So people with this disorder actually take on the identity of the people they're spending time with because it's comforting. It's very uncomfortable to not know who you are. Some people with this disorder describe a feeling of emptiness when they feel like they've been p y y abandoned because now they don't know who they are in the world. And so when somebody with this disorder is going through that initial enmeshment phase with new people and they're idealizing them, they often will take on the identities of those people, so they may mimic them in a lot of ways. They might mimic them in the way they dress, their interests, the way they talk. And for this reason, the people around somebody with this disorder kind of from the outside may feel like, "Wait, I thought you were this way.

247 2:31:07

DR. CURRY: Now you're advocating for this, and this is your new main interest in life or the thing you're throwing yourself into all completely." Music tastes might change. Hobbies will change, the way they dress.

248 2:31:20

MR. DENNISON: Okay. In addition to borderline personality disorder, I understand that you diagnosed another personality disorder. What's that?

249 2:31:32

DR. CURRY: So histrionic personality disorder -- and these are really two sides of the same coin. They belong to the same cluster, we call these clusters. It's a way to organize personality disorders in that DSM, and this cluster is described as the personality disorders that are dramatic, they're erratic, and emotional, okay? So unpredictable but really having to do with emotions and relationships. They're very similar.

250 2:32:01

DR. CURRY: Whereas I was saying that borderline personality disorder, a lot of the key features that you're going to notice are instability, when it comes to histrionic, a lot of the key features are going to be drama and shallowness. Similarly, with borderline personality disorder, there's this under - this underlying drive of avoiding abandonment. With histrionic personality disorder, that underlying drive is to always be the center of attention.

251 2:32:31

DR. CURRY: Because if you don't have that attention on you, it feels similarly to borderline personality disorder; you feel pretty I empty, like you don't have that sense of being or of value, okay?

252 2:32:45

DR. CURRY: So whereas borderline personality disorder might have more the visible reactivity if I Is somebody seems to be leaving, with histrionic personality disorder, what you're going to see is extreme discomfort with not being the center of attention, extreme efforts to be the center of attention, and when they feel they're not the center of attention, you will see some strange things, making up stories to try to get attention, often taking on a victim or a princess role, those two roles in_particular are pretty consistent, seeking caretaking.

253 2:33:20

DR. CURRY: Borderline personality disorder is similar because with borderline personality disorder, the shifts of identity and the splitting, you might see somebody go from being - in the DSM it describes it as "a needy supplicant of help," seeking the perfect caretaker, to suddenly being the avenger against injustice or thinking that their partner is a terrible person. With histrionic, what you'll see is somebody who wants to be the center of attention, has sort of that impressionist speech, very flowery, very enthusiastic, but nothing's really being said. The moment your attention wears away, because they're so demanding for attention, that's when they might take the victim role or the princess role and even make up stories. Sometimes those stories are to bolster the victim role. Sometimes those stories are just to make them look more interesting or accomplished in their mind so that they can get respect and attention that way.

254 2:34:21

MR. DENNISON: Is there a relation between histrionic personality disorder and attractiveness?

255 2:34:27

DR. CURRY: There is, strangely. And this is always one of the trickiest things to talk about because how do you -- I mean, how is that a symptom? But characteristically people with this disorder are very, very interested in looks, but more importantly, they utilize their looks to get that attention, to get that respect that they're seeking. And so this type of a personality might be flirtatious with everybody. Characteristically they actually could even be subtly -- and when I say flirtatious, I'm not talking overtly sexy, but kind of inappropriately flattering. Sometimes they act in kind of a girlish way to be cute and to engender attention.

256 2:35:11

DR. CURRY: And this will even occur in their therapy relationships as a way to sort of avoid getting negative feedback or criticism. Other times, they'll bring the therapist gifts or be distracting if they engage in therapy because they just don't want any criticism. They want the therapist to like them.

257 2:35:30

MR. DENNISON: Does the intelligence of the affected person bear on the maimer in which these disorders present?

258 2:35:38

DR. CURRY: Excuse me. I choked a little bit on my water.

259 2:35:43

DR. CURRY: Yes. And I think one way to think about it that's probably a little more accurate than just intelligence is in psychology, we would describe this more as sophistication, so street smarts, so to speak. The way - for instance, I've had many clients who have borderline personality disorder who are messy and really clearly suffering, and they might be difficult and I all over the place and yell at you in the middle of a session. But it's so -- it's not tailored. It's so much easier to work with because of that just openness and rawness of it, genuineness.

260 2:36:30

DR. CURRY: Sometimes you'll have a more sophisticated presentation. There are nine symptoms, and only five have to be met. There are a lot of different combinations and different ways that it can present. And sometimes you'll have more of a petulant version of this where it really shows when you push the button and you're kind of, "Woah, what was that?" So somebody who's really productive, high functioning, successful, and you get to know them and you think they're fantastic because they're so interested in you too, and you might not realize this, but they're mimicking you perfectly.

261 2:37:03

DR. CURRY: So you're really just kind of falling in love with this new friend who is being you. But then all of a sudden, you know, you say something that they think is offensive, and you can't, even in your wildest thoughts, understand how that could have offended somebody," but their reaction is so strong that you kind of buy into it. "Gosh, maybe I did say something offensive," and you feel bad about it So that sophisticated version, they can be a little bit more calculated in the way they present. They tend to kind of hit you where it hurts a little bit more, and they can be actually very, very destructive.

262 2:37:41

MR. DENNISON: What conclusions were you able to draw about Ms. Beard's sophistication from her testing?

263 2:37:48

DR. CURRY: Well, from her testing and from her presentation, she was very likeable, but her testing, in particular, showed that she approached it in a manner that - remember I told you about those scales that are pretty neat- she approached it in a manner that very clearly minimized any psychological dysfunction, not just that, but really presented herself free of any problems. And she did so in a way that was very, very sophisticated, not obvious, by responding to questions that most people might not notice were trying to detect that.

264 2:38:34

MR. DENNISON: How did you determine that?

265 2:38:36

DR. CURRY: So that's based on a particular scale on the MMPI-2 that is designed specifically to detect a type of responding that's a little bit more clever, a little bit more sophisticated, minimizing problems in a way that most laypeople probably wouldn't understand - and even providers, very difficult to detect.

266 2:39:02

MR. DENNISON: You mentioned that one of the characteristics of borderline personality disorder is emotional reactivity. How might that present in an intimate relationship?

267 2:39:15

DR. CURRY: So I think it probably presents mostly - or you'd see the bulk of it in intimate relationships because of that regular interaction and the desire for your partner to meet all of your needs, to be the perfect caretaker. Also that the hallmark of the disorder with the splitting, so idealizing, devaluing, and the perceiving of all sorts of neutral events as somehow demeaning or disrespectful.

268 2:39:46

DR. CURRY: It's regular escalations of anger, g g , frustrated, complaints, criticisms of your partner. But because the person with borderline personality disorder, first of all, they're more sensitive to things. They feel distress more strongly, and then that distress lasts longer. So these types of blowups go on forever, and they're very cyclic. It feels like you can't just get a resolution, and eventually, the partner will try to leave, will want to leave to get a break. It wears them down, and that's when the borderline might explode and act very aggressively or violently to try to prevent them from leaving.

269 2:40:35

MR. DENNISON: Okay. In addition to diagnosing Ms. Heard with these two personality disorders, did you form another opinion about Ms. Beard's mental status?

270 2:40:48

DR. CURRY: Yes. So there were - go ahead.

271 2:40:53

MR. DENNISON: If the answer to that is yes, I'm going to now ask you, "What was that?"

272 2:40:55

DR. CURRY: Okay. Yes, I did.

273 2:40:57

MR. DENNISON: Okay. What is it?

274 2:40:59

DR. CURRY: So in addition to looking for Ms. Heard's general mental status, any psychological issues that were present, I very specifically was assessing to determine whether post-traumatic stress disorder was present, and it was not.

275 2:41:13

MR. DENNISON: How do you know that?

276 2:41:15

DR. CURRY: So first of all, from multiple Is information sources, right? So I was integrating the interview, my review of the data, the case records, other people's testimony, her treatment • 11 records.

277 2:41:28

DR. CURRY: And then I also conducted - in addition to the MMPI-2 and looking at that data, I also conducted the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale, the CAPS-5, which is the gold standard PTSD assessment developed by the National Center for PTSD, shown to be valid, accurate for use not just with service members, but also with civilians, men, women, all genders, and also all ethnicities and then also specifically for use in a courtroom setting.

278 2:42:03

MR. DENNISON: How do you conduct the CAPS-5?

279 2:42:05

DR. CURRY: So the CAPS-5 is a standard interview. What that means is that it's an interview with very clear questions that are scripted. And you ask those same questions every time you test a person. So because you're doing that, you're actually taking something that would typically be kind of subjective, an interview with somebody, and you're making it more objective. When you ask those same questions in the same way every time somebody's assessed with this, now you can apply a scoring protocol and actually score their responses.

280 2:42:41

MR. DENNISON: Okay. As a result of applying those I protocols, what did you conclude?

281 2:42:46

DR. CURRY: Ms. Heard did not have PTSD. And there were also pretty significant indications that she was grossly exaggerating symptoms of PTSD when asked about them.

282 2:42:57

MR. DENNISON: How did you make that latter conclusion?

283 2:43:01

DR. CURRY: So one of the strengths of this test, as I mentioned, the important thing about any test used when you're doing an evaluation in forensics is to make sure that the person is responding accurately. And this test does that by not just asking people whether they have a symptom, but asking follow-up questions that draw out very detailed accounts of every single symptom of PTSD.

284 2:43:28

DR. CURRY: And when you're really familiar with this disorder, which you need to be to administer this test, there are nuances in the way a person will describe their symptoms that have been shown. repeatedly to indicate exaggeration or faking. There are also indications when somebody is clearly giving you a genuine response.

285 2:43:51

MR. DENNISON: Okay. What, if any, symptoms of PTSD did you observe in Ms. Heard?

286 2:43:58

DR. CURRY: So there are 20 kind of core symptoms that somebody might -- can manifest with PTSD; you don't have to have all of them. Ms. Heard initially said that she had, in the first question, you say, "Do you ever have this?" before you get to the more nuanced follow-up questions. When I asked that question on each item, she initially said, "Yes, I have that," to 19 of the 20 symptoms. That's not typical even of somebody with the most disabling form of PTSD.

287 2:44:30

DR. CURRY: When we eventually sort of dialed it down, she had three remaining symptoms, and having symptoms of any disorder is common for all of us. Some of us struggle with sleep. Some of us get anxious. It could be several different disorders. It could just be that you have this struggle in your life.

288 2:44:50

DR. CURRY: But she had three specific symptoms that I scored as present. Off the top of my head-- I might miss one, but one was sleep disturbance. So she reported that she had frequent nightmares. Another one that she says she tends to have is a startle response, so if she gets startled or surprised, she tends to stay in sort of a hyper-startled mode for quite a while, and that's consistent with a couple of things. It can be consistent with PISD if other criteria are met. It's also consistent with childhood complex trauma, which is something that can occur -- when I your brain is forming, if you constantly feel unsafe, if your parents are abusive, or if they're not present, if you're neglected, you can develop certain physiological responses that can stay for a long time in your life. So I noted that. That seems like a very genuine, accurate account where she stays in this state of kind of hyperarousal, has a hard time calming down if she gets surprised.

289 2:45:56

MR. DENNISON: You mentioned nightmares as well. In

290 2:45:58

DR. CURRY: Yes.

291 2:45:59

MR. DENNISON: Did she recount for you the nature of the nightmares?

292 2:46:02

DR. CURRY: So they were vague. She indicated that she has recurrent nightmares and that she feels as though she's being held down. And there were some conflict in that account because even though that could be a PTSD symptom, it is fairly vague, but I still scored it as present. And in her initial treatment with Ms. -- I'm sorry, with Dr. Bonnie Jacobs, which I believe started before she began dating Mr. Depp, she had indicated to Dr. Jacobs, according to Dr. Jacobs's notes, that she was having repetitive nightmares back then and that they were related to her childhood trauma. And so that came up several times in the notes. Dr. Jacobs kept mentioning that.

293 2:46:52

MR. DENNISON: Thank you. What is feigning?

294 2:47:00

DR. CURRY: Feigning is essentially faking or exaggerating symptoms that aren't present.

295 2:47:07

MR. DENNISON: Does the CAPS-5 control for that?

296 2:47:11

DR. CURRY: It doesn't necessarily control for it. It can expose it by --

297 2:47:15

MR. DENNISON: And how is that -- how does that work? p3

298 2:47:17

DR. CURRY: Because you're not just simply handing the person a checklist that says, "Here are all the symptoms of PTSD. Just check off the ones you have," which clearly if you're trying to look like you had PTSD, you would just check them all. The CAPS-5, because it requires them to describe in detail how they experience the symptom, where it shows up, what it looks like, what sort of examples they can give you, how many times it's happened in the last couple weeks, how many times it's happened in the last month, by the end of each symptom, you've gotten a very good picture of a couple things: One, does it meet the definition of the symptom? Are they getting it right? Right. Is this actually the symptom? Or are they kind of confusing this with something else?

299 2:48:01

DR. CURRY: Number two, are they giving you very vague accounts? Are they giving you kind of a stereotyped idea of what the symptom is based on media or movies or something that actually is completely different from genuine experiences of this symptom? Or are they giving you a very genuine, heartfelt -- sometimes minimizing, but it's ticking all the boxes, their mannerisms while they're describing it, the actual very specific, very nuanced, symbolic ways they're describing it, a lot of times it's smells; it's sounds.

300 2:48:40

DR. CURRY: That all appears in genuine accounts, and it's something that people really get wrong when they're feigning.

301 2:48:49

MR. DENNISON: All right. In addition to your conclusion that Ms. Heard does not have PTSD, did, you make a conclusion with respect to her symptoms?

302 2:48:59

DR. CURRY: Yes, actually, I did. So, you know, just because somebody doesn't have PTSD doesn't mean that they weren't harmed psychologically by whatever is being alleged. In this case, Ms. Heard is alleging that she was psychologically harmed and that she had suffered PTSD because of abuse that she alleges occurred by Mr. Depp.

303 2:49:21

DR. CURRY: So I also -- the MMPI-2 is helpful because it shows you kind of everything, any other symptoms, and then in Ms. Heard's own self-report and her prior treatment record, I knew that she had reported to me that she had had some other symptoms.

304 2:49:37

DR. CURRY: So now what becomes really important is determining -- and let me clarify one thing here, not so much a diagnosis, but did she start to experience symptoms during the relationship and after? Did they worsen after? Or could these types of symptoms or reports be explained by other factors? A, by feigning; B, by preexisting I conditions; or, C, by other stressful life events that might have occurred?

305 2:50:07

DR. CURRY: So the main symptoms that I was looking at didn't meet criteria for PTSD, right? There was also, you know, substantial evidence of this sort of emotional dysregulation, emotional disorganization, the shallowness, the dramatic affect. Now, when you have a lot of childhood trauma, you can actually have some similar-type presentation in adulthood There are some differences, though.

306 2:50:33

DR. CURRY: But also that's not something that would have occurred after this relationship. So now I was looking at are there indications that these types of things that she's described, this transient anxiety, the issues with sleep, were these there prior? And sure enough, Ms. Heard, in her own self-report, stated to me that when she first got to LA, she was seeking treatment for, in her words, "blanket anxiety and depression." She also reported that she was taking medications in general. None of them were helpful.

307 2:51:04

DR. CURRY: That's actually very typical of borderline personality disorder. Medications typically aren't very helpful for somebody with a disorder. They really need an intensive, lifelong type of therapy which is not necessarily as relevant to this.

308 2:51:21

DR. CURRY: But interestingly also, people with I.

309 2:51:24

DR. CURRY: Borderline personality disorder often respond really positively to stimulant medications that are given for ADD or ADHD. And in one of Nurse Falati's notes, she reported that Ms. Heard told her that none of the medications were working for her except for one, Provigil, which is often prescribed as stimulant medication, and I had just thought that was interesting and sort of consistent with more of these lifelong personality disorders that aren't necessarily caused by a harm, by any allegations but have been there and will remain there, typically.

310 2:52:01

DR. CURRY: The other issue, you know, so the anxiety, she's had already indicated that that had been there prior, but the form of the anxiety, so looking at Dr. Hughes's testing and then also looking at the scores on the MMPI, when you look at all these little combination of the scores, you can actually learn a lot about is the anxiety related to an event? Or is this more a person who tends to be an anxious person regardless of what's going on in their life and somebody might describe them as a worry wart?

311 2:52:30

DR. CURRY: And the scores, the little combination of scores that she obtained actually indicated that it was the latter, that her anxiety tends to be separate from events and more just kind of a constant, and it comes and goes but its more of a trait.

312 2:52:49

MR. DENNISON: I have no further questions for this witness.

Procedural
313 2:52:51

THE COURT: All right. Maybe -- why don't we go ahead and, Ms. Bredehoft, go ahead and have our lunch break? Might be a good idea to break it up there.

314 2:52:55

MS. BREDEHOFT: I didn't even get there.

315 2:52:59

THE COURT: Okay. I could see you jurors jumping up. All right.

316 2:53:01

THE COURT: Ladies and gentlemen, let's go ahead and take our lunch recess. Again, do not do any outside research and don't discuss the case with anybody, okay? And we'll meet back here.

317

[STAGE DIRECTION]: (Whereupon, the jury exited the courtroom and the following proceedings took place.)

318 2:53:32

THE COURT: All right. And, again, Dr. Curry, since you're in the middle of your testimony, please do not discuss your testimony with anybody at this time.

319 2:53:37

DR. CURRY: Okay.

320 2:53:37

THE COURT: All right. Let's just -- why don't we come back at 1: 50, okay? Come back at 1: 50, okay?

321 3:05:32

DR. CURRY: Thank you, Your Honor.

322 3:17:26

MS. BREDEHOFT: Thank you, Your Honor.

323 3:29:21

COURT BAILIFF: All rise.

324

[STAGE DIRECTION]: (Recess taken from 12:40 p.m to 1:47 p.m.)

325 3:41:16

COURT BAILIFF: All rise. Please be seated and come to order.

326

THE COURT: All right. Are we ready for the jury?

327 3:53:11

TARA ROBERTS: Yes, Your Honor.

328 4:05:06

THE COURT: All right. Great. thank you.

329

[SECTION HEADER]: EXAMINATION BY COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT AND BY MS. BREDEHOFT:

330

[STAGE DIRECTION]: (Whereupon, the jury entered the courtroom and the following proceedings took place.)

331 4:05:10

MS. BREDEHOFT: Dr. Curry, you're not board certified, correct?

332 4:05:13

DR. CURRY: No, I'm not.

333 4:05:14

MS. BREDEHOFT: Not in clinical psychology or in forensic psychology, correct?

334 4:05:19

DR. CURRY: No. I'm a licensed clinical psychologist.

335 4:05:21

MS. BREDEHOFT: But you're not board certified?

336 4:05:23
337 4:05:23

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And you also have only been practicing, approximately, eight years; is that correct?

338 4:05:29

DR. CURRY: That's not correct.

339 4:05:30

MS. BREDEHOFT: How many years?

340 4:05:31

DR. CURRY: I've been licensed for ten years.

341 4:05:33
342 4:05:33

DR. CURRY: And I've been practicing for about 15 years.

343 4:05:36

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And that includes what you went through with your different trials in Hawaii and everything else that you testified to, correct?

344 4:05:43

DR. CURRY: Yes.

345 4:05:44

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now, you went to Mr. Depp's home for dinner and drinks before you were hired as an expert in this case, correct?

346 4:05:53

DR. CURRY: That's not quite right. I was interviewed at Mr. Depp's home by his legal team Dinner was served.

347 4:06:01

MS. BREDEHOFT: In attendance with Mr. Depp was Adam Waldman, correct?

348 4:06:06

DR. CURRY: Yes.

349 4:06:06

MS. BREDEHOFT: Ben Chew, correct?

350 4:06:08

DR. CURRY: Yes.

351 4:06:09

MS. BREDEHOFT: Camille Vasquez?

352 4:06:10

DR. CURRY: Yes.

353 4:06:10

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And the dinner lasted, approximately, three to four hours, correct?

354 4:06:15

DR. CURRY: Yes, the interview.

355 4:06:18

MS. BREDEHOFT: And it included drinks, correct?

356 4:06:18

DR. CURRY: Yes. Dinner and, I believe, drinks were served.

357 4:06:21

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And this was before you were hired as an expert, correct?

358 4:06:25

DR. CURRY: Yes, this was an interview so that they could make an informed decision as to whether or not to retain me.

359 4:06:31

MS. BREDEHOFT: And don't you think that's a little odd, that you're getting interviewed by Mr. Depp to decide whether you're going to testify y g g y adversely against Amber Heard?

360 4:06:42

DR. CURRY: I was interviewed by the legal team.

361 4:06:45

MS. BREDEHOFT: And Mr. Depp was present, it was his home, correct?

362 4:06:48

DR. CURRY: Yes.

363 4:06:49

MS. BREDEHOFT: And be was serving dinner and drinks, correct?

364 4:06:51

DR. CURRY: He was not serving dinner and drinks.

365 4:06:53

MS. BREDEHOFT: Well, it was at his house, at his behest, correct?

366 4:06:56

DR. CURRY: Yes, it was at his house.

367 4:06:58

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And you were contacted by Camille Vasquez, somebody you knew in the community, in February of 2020; is that correct?

368 4:07:06

DR. CURRY: I knew of Ms. Vasquez professionally. We live in the same city, and I work with many attorneys.

369 4:07:12

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And at that time, you not only knew Johnny Depp, you'd seen a number of his TV and movie roles and you believed he was a good actor, correct?

370 4:07:21

DR. CURRY: Not correct. I did not know Johnny Depp.

371 4:07:25

DR. CURRY: AQ You knew of him? I had seen several of his movies.

372 4:07:26

MS. BREDEHOFT: You knew who he was, correct?

373 4:07:27

DR. CURRY: Yes.

374 4:07:27

MS. BREDEHOFT: And you believed he was a good actor, correct? .8

375 4:07:29

DR. CURRY: Yes.

376 4:07:31

MS. BREDEHOFT: And then you provided an expert I designation in this case before ever seeing Amber ! or having an opportunity to review any documents or records; isn't that correct?

377 4:07:42

DR. CURRY: I did not provide an expert designation. That's an attorney thing. My opinions are contained in my report.

378 4:07:57

MS. BREDEHOFT: Let's pull up Plaintiffs Exhibit 884, please.

379 4:08:04

MS. BREDEHOFT: This was plaintiffs designation, identification of expert witnesses in this case, and this is dated February 2021, that's a year after you went to dinner at Mr. Depp's house, correct?

380 4:08:18

DR. CURRY: Yes.

381 4:08:18

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And it attributes, if you go to page 13, it says you have three opinions. The first of those is that Amber Heard "exhibits patterns of behavior that are consistent with co-occurring Cluster B Personality Disorder traits, especially Borderline Personality Disorder." Did I get that right?

382 4:08:44

DR. CURRY: I'm reading that here. That's not my opinion. It's a current opinion, but this was not an opinion of mine then. I did not have any opinions at that time.

383 4:08:52

MS. BREDEHOFT: It says "Dr. Curry will testify," correct?

384 4:08:55

DR. CURRY: That's what it says, yes.

385 4:08:57

MS. BREDEHOFT: And this is a signed pleading, correct, on behalf of Mr. Depp?

386 4:09:01

DR. CURRY: I'm not sure I understand what that means.

387 4:09:05

MS. BREDEHOFT: You don't understand what a signed pleading is?

388 4:09:07
389 4:09:08

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you understand that Mr. Depp's counsel prepared this and served it on Ms. Beard's counsel?

390 4:09:17

DR. CURRY: I'm not an attorney. I don't understand, necessarily, all of these procedures.

391 4:09:21

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Are you aware that Mr. Depp is on an audio recording, years earlier, taunting Amber Heard that she has a borderline personality disorder?

392 4:09:31

DR. CURRY: I was made aware of that in this case, yes. Actually, not necessarily taunting, but I do recall hearing that Mr. Depp had used that phrase.

393 4:09:41

MS. BREDEHOFT: So, it's a coincidence that you now think she has those attributes, after the attorneys listed it in February 2021, before you'd looked at anything, and Mr. Depp had made that accusation to Ms. Heard years earlier?

394 4:09:57

DR. CURRY: My opinion -

395 4:09:58

MR. DENNISON: Objection.

396 4:10:00

THE COURT: There's an objection.

397 4:10:01

MR. DENNISON: Compound.

398 4:10:02

THE COURT: I'll sustain the objection.

399 4:10:03

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right.

400 4:10:04

MS. BREDEHOFT: It's a coincidence, then, that you came up with symptoms of borderline personality disorder years later, after Mr. Depp had been taunting Ms. Heard in an audiotape?

401 4:10:17

DR. CURRY: I can't speak to whether or not there's a coincidence. What I can tell you is, my opinions are based on the results of my evaluation.

402 4:10:23

MS. BREDEHOFT: And it's a coincidence that Mr. Depp's counsel attributed that to you, that to you, in February 2021, before you'd looked at anything, correct?

403 4:10:36

DR. CURRY: I'm not sure.

404 4:10:38

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now, would you agree that a disproportionate number of women are tagged with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder?

405 4:10:49

DR. CURRY: No. That's not quite right.

406 4:10:52

MS. BREDEHOFT: Percent?

407 4:10:54

DR. CURRY: The way you phrased it is not quite right.

408 4:10:57

MS. BREDEHOFT: Tell me what's right.

409 4:10:59

DR. CURRY: Okay. So there are more women who have been diagnosed with bipolar disorder than men, it's more prevalent in women.

410 4:11:07

MS. BREDEHOFT: And trauma can cause borderline personality disorder, can't it?

411 4:11:11
412 4:11:12
413 4:11:13

DR. CURRY: Right now, we know that there are people who have borderline personality disorder who have sustained childhood trauma. There are also people who have borderline personality disorder who have had no childhood trauma.

414 4:11:27

DR. CURRY: So, like most personality disorders, and really like most mental health issues in general, there seems to be both a biological component, in this case, with borderline personality disorder, the research tends to support a genetic component and possibly a neurological component, and then there's also, possibly, an environmental component triggering those genetic marks.

415 4:11:49

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you know the percentage of women who are victims of IPV, intimate partner violence, or domestic abuse who are diagnosed with borderline personality disorder?

416 4:11:59

DR. CURRY: I can't tell you the percentage off the top of my head, but I do know that there is a larger - women with borderline personality disorder tend to have a higher prevalence of being involved in intimate partner violence relationships, being the receiver of violence and being the perpetuator of violence.

417 4:12:18

MS. BREDEHOFT: Now, you've never been asked to testify I or serve as an expert with respect to whether I someone has a bipolar disorder; is that correct?

418 4:12:26

DR. CURRY: Bipolar disorder?

419 4:12:31
420 4:12:35

DR. CURRY: That's not correct. •18

421 4:12:52

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Bear with me. Your Honor, may I approach?

422 4:13:10

THE COURT: Yes, ma'am. Thank you.

423 4:13:14

DR. CURRY: Thank you.

424 4:13:19

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall having your deposition taken in this case?

425 4:13:21

DR. CURRY: Yes.

426 4:13:21

MS. BREDEHOFT: On March 21, 2022?

427 4:13:23

DR. CURRY: I believe that was the date, yes.

428 4:13:25

MS. BREDEHOFT: And were you under oath at that time?

429 4:13:26

DR. CURRY: Yes.

430 4:13:26

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right. I'm going to ask you to turn to page 207. And the question was, "Have you ever been asked to testify, or serve as an expert, with respect to whether someone has bipolar disorder?" And your answer, at that time, will you please read to the jury?

431 4:13:43

DR. CURRY: I'm sorry. Page 207?

432 4:13:45

MS. BREDEHOFT: 207, line 5.

433 4:13:47

DR. CURRY: Ah. "No."

434 4:13:49

MS. BREDEHOFT: Could you -- okay. Thank you.

435 4:13:52

MS. BREDEHOFT: Now, when this designation was served in February of 2021, you had not rendered an opinion that "Ms. Heard exhibits patterns of behavior that are consistent with co-occurring Cluster B Personality Disorder traits, especially" Borderline Personality Disorder, correct?

436 4:14:11

DR. CURRY: I'm sorry, I missed the first part. What was that?

437 4:14:14

MS. BREDEHOFT: When this designation was served, that you have in front of you as Plaintiffs Exhibit 8 84 --

438 4:14:17

DR. CURRY: Oh, okay.

439 4:14:20

MS. BREDEHOFT: You had not rendered an opinion that "Ms. Heard exhibits patterns of behavior that are consistent with co-occurring Cluster B Personality disorder traits, especially Borderline Personality Disorder," correct?

440 4:14:32

DR. CURRY: No, I didn't render any opinions. My opinions weren't finalized until after my evaluation.

441 4:14:37

MS. BREDEHOFT: When this came out, you had not rendered that opinion?

442 4:14:41

DR. CURRY: I had not rendered that opinion.

443 4:14:43

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. The second opinion that's listed in the February 2021, is that Ms. Heard "repeatedly and characterologically perpetuated [sic] severe physical and psychological intimate" partner violence, IPV, toward Mr. Depp over the course of their relationship.

444 4:15:05

DR. CURRY: It says perpetrated, but other than that, yes.

445 4:15:08

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And so, is it correct that this pleading says, in February 2021, that you are going to testify to that?

446 4:15:19

DR. CURRY: This document, yes.

447 4:15:21

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. In

448 4:15:21

DR. CURRY: It says that.

449 4:15:22

MS. BREDEHOFT: And you have never been asked to testify as to whether anyone has behaviorally or characterologically conducted -- conduct that suggest they might have been an IPV perpetrator, correct?

450 4:15:37

MS. BREDEHOFT: I have to ask that again because I stumbled.

451 4:15:37

DR. CURRY: Thank you.

452 4:15:38

MS. BREDEHOFT: I can't do characterologically.

453 4:15:40

DR. CURRY: Thank you.

454 4:15:41

MS. BREDEHOFT: That's a tough one for me.

455 4:15:42

MS. BREDEHOFT: You have never been asked to testify as to whether anyone has behavioral or characterological conduct that suggests they may have been an IPV perpetrator, correct?

456 4:15:54

DR. CURRY: No, I've never been asked to testify to that.

457 4:15:57

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And that was not your opinion in February 2021, correct?

458 4:16:01
459 4:16:02

MS. BREDEHOFT: In fact, you do not hold that opinion l l now, and you were not even asked to provide such an analysis or opinion; isn't that correct?

460 4:16:09

DR. CURRY: No. That is correct, yes.

461 4:16:12

MS. BREDEHOFT: That is correct, okay.

462 4:16:12

MS. BREDEHOFT: And you have never held that opinion, I correct?

463 4:16:17

DR. CURRY: No. That is correct, yes.

464 4:16:20

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And your third opinion, if we can go to page 14, was that Ms. Heard "exhibits patterns of behavior that suggest her allegations of abuse against Mr. Depp are false." Do you see that?

465 4:16:35

DR. CURRY: I see that. You said it's my third opinion. That is not my opinion.

466 4:16:40

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right. But in this pleading, it says that you will testify to that, correct?

467 4:16:44

DR. CURRY: Yes, that's what this says.

468 4:16:46

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And that was not your opinion in February 2021, was it?

469 4:16:50

DR. CURRY: No. As I said, I had not formed any opinions at that time. I had just been retained.

470 4:16:56

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And, in fact, you have never arrived at this opinion as an expert witness in this case, correct?

471 4:17:06

DR. CURRY: In terms - no, the opinions that I've rendered are provided in my report.

472 4:17:11

MS. BREDEHOFT: And you have --

473 4:17:11

DR. CURRY: They're what I'm testifying to today.

474 4:17:14

MS. BREDEHOFT: And you have never arrived at this opinion as an expert witness in this case, correct?

475 4:17:18

MR. DENNISON: Objection. Vague.

476 4:17:21

THE COURT: I'll sustain it.

477 4:17:25

MS. BREDEHOFT: You have never arrived at the opinion p that Ms. Heard exhibits patterns of behavior that suggest her allegations of abuse against Mr. Depp are false, correct?

478 4:17:35

DR. CURRY: That's correct.

479 4:17:37

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And, in fact, you've said that has never been my opinion, correct?

480 4:17:42

DR. CURRY: What I'm saying is that this, the opinions in here, these are not my opinions. My opinions are provided in my report.

481 4:17:50

MS. BREDEHOFT: Can you, please, turn to page 255 of your deposition.

482 4:18:04

MS. BREDEHOFT: And if we can start on 254 to give the context.

483 4:18:06

DR. CURRY: I don't have that page, I'm sorry.

484 4:18:09

MS. BREDEHOFT: 254, line 11?

485 4:18:11

DR. CURRY: Oh, okay.

486 4:18:13

MS. BREDEHOFT: And the question is, "Now, the next one is 'Ms. Heard exhibits patterns of behavior that suggest her allegations of abuse against Mr. Depp are false.'

487 4:18:22

MS. BREDEHOFT: "Was that your opinion in February of 2021 ?"

488 4:18:24

MS. BREDEHOFT: And you answered, at that time, no, correct?

489 4:18:28

DR. CURRY: That is correct. I 4

490 4:18:29

MS. BREDEHOFT: And then I asked, "Have you ever arrived at that opinion in the time that you have served as an expert witness in this case?"

491 4:18:36

MS. BREDEHOFT: And your answer was? Can you read that I 8 for the jury, please?

492 4:18:39

DR. CURRY: Yes. "So, no, it's not the task" - I was cut off - essentially, what I wrote - what I said then was -

493 4:18:45

MS. BREDEHOFT: Dr. Curry.

494

DR. CURRY: No. That's not the task of - that was never my task to determine.

495 4:18:51

MS. BREDEHOFT: Can I say what that means?

496 4:18:53
497 4:18:53

MS. BREDEHOFT: And then the question is, "So, is it fair to say that you have never arrived at an opinion that 'Ms. Heard exhibits patterns of behavior that suggest her allegations of abuse against Mr. Depp are false'?"

498 4:19:06

MS. BREDEHOFT: And what was your answer?

499 4:19:11

DR. CURRY: Well, there was an objection.

500 4:19:12

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right. I'll read it for you, if you're having difficulty.

501 4:19:14

DR. CURRY: No, no.

502 4:19:15

MS. BREDEHOFT: Your answer was, under oath, "Correct. That is not my opinion. That has never been my opinion."

503 4:19:22

MS. BREDEHOFT: Isn't that what you said --

504 4:19:23

DR. CURRY: Correct.

505 4:19:24

MS. BREDEHOFT: Under oath on March 21st? Okay.

506 4:19:27

MS. BREDEHOFT: And then I wrote -- then I'm going to ask you, "Do you know who wrote this portion of the designation suggesting that these were your opinions in February of 2021?"

507 4:19:38

MS. BREDEHOFT: And what was your answer?

508 4:19:41

DR. CURRY: I said, "No."

509 4:19:43

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now, as of the time of this initial expert designation, you had not reviewed any materials, reached any opinions, correct?

510 4:19:53

DR. CURRY: I believe I had just started to review materials. I believe that I indicated that in my deposition. I had not, yet, rendered any opinions. I hadn't completed my review, and I hadn't conducted an evaluation.

511 4:20:07

MS. BREDEHOFT: And, in fact, you've never testified as an expert on IPV, intimate partner violence; isn't that correct?

512 4:20:18

DR. CURRY: I believe that is correct. But I may not be remembering all of my cases.

513 4:20:22

MS. BREDEHOFT: Well, let's go to page 200.

514 4:20:31

DR. CURRY: Okay.

515 4:20:33

MS. BREDEHOFT: Line 17. My question was, "Have you ever testified as an expert on IPV?"

516 4:20:40

MS. BREDEHOFT: And your answer, under oath, then, at line 22, was what?

517 4:20:45

DR. CURRY: Gosh, let me catch up. Line 22.

518 4:20:49

DR. CURRY: "No."

519 4:20:50

MS. BREDEHOFT: And you've never testified as an expert on emotional distress damages associated with IPV; is that correct?

520 4:20:56

DR. CURRY: That's correct.

521 4:20:58

MS. BREDEHOFT: And you've never been asked to testify with respect to emotional damages associated with domestic violence or abuse; isn't that correct?

522 4:21:09

DR. CURRY: Again, that -- I'm reluctant to say that's correct because with 15 years of experiences -- experience, a lot of my cases have been complex, and that may have been a component. But I don't remember, explicitly, a case being just about that.

523 4:21:26

MS. BREDEHOFT: Let's go to page 199, line 20. My question to you was, "Have you ever been asked to testify with respect to emotional damages associated with domestic violence or abuse?"

524 4:21:38

MS. BREDEHOFT: And your answer, under oath, at that time, was?

525 4:21:42
526 4:21:43

MS. BREDEHOFT: "I've not," right?

527 4:21:46

DR. CURRY: I hadn't gone to the page in time.

528 4:21:47

MS. BREDEHOFT: You said, "No, I've not."

529 4:21:50

DR. CURRY: But I have not.

530 4:21:53

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now, you also have never been asked to testify on whether an individual's being truthful in saying that they are a survivor of IPV; is that correct?

531 4:22:02

DR. CURRY: That's correct.

532 4:22:03

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And you have never qualified as an expert to speak to whether a person suffered from IPV, intimate partner violence, or was a victim or survivor of IPV; is that correct?

533 4:22:15

DR. CURRY: That's outside the task of a psychologist, to determine whether an event , occurred. We assess behavior, we assess mental status, we don't detect crimes.

534 4:22:27

MS. BREDEHOFT: So you have not been asked to testify O to that, correct?

535 4:22:30

DR. CURRY: It's not something that occurs, so, no, I have not

536 4:22:32

MS. BREDEHOFT: And you were not ultimately asked to provide any opinions on that, correct?

537 4:22:36

DR. CURRY: No, I was not.

538 4:22:38

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now, you did not disclose in any of the designations, or your report, that you had met with and had dinner and drinks with Mr. Depp, did you?

539 4:22:50

DR. CURRY: I'm sorry. Can you repeat that one more time?

540 4:22:51
541 4:22:52

DR. CURRY: Excuse me.

542 4:22:53

MS. BREDEHOFT: You did not disclose in any of the ) designations, or in your report, that you had ,4 dinner and drinks with Mr. Depp, correct?

543 4:23:01

DR. CURRY: I did not disclose that I was interviewed by the legal team, no.

544 4:23:07

MS. BREDEHOFT: I asked a different question.

545 4:23:09

MS. BREDEHOFT: Are you trying to resist that you , didn't have dinner with Mr. Depp and drinks?

546 4:23:13

DR. CURRY: I'm not trying to resist that, but it's I not quite right.

547 4:23:17

MS. BREDEHOFT: You did have dinner with Mr. Depp; did you not?

548 4:23:20

DR. CURRY: I did. With his legal team

549 4:23:22

MS. BREDEHOFT: And you had drinks with Mr. Depp; did you not?

550 4:23:23

DR. CURRY: And what?

551 4:23:23

MS. BREDEHOFT: You had drinks with Mr. Depp; did you I not?

552 4:23:26

DR. CURRY: Drinks were served. This was over two years ago. I may have had a drink with dinner, yes.

553 4:23:32

MS. BREDEHOFT: In fact, you thought you had a mule something, right?

554 4:23:35

DR. CURRY: Possibly.

555 4:23:36

MS. BREDEHOFT: And you didn't disclose that you had met with Mr. Depp, Mr. Waldman, Mr. Chew, and Ms. Vasquez at Mr. Depp's house for three to four hours and had dinner and drinks?

556 4:23:48

DR. CURRY: I did not disclose that. It's not significant to the report.

557 4:23:53

MS. BREDEHOFT: You don't think that's significant, correct?

558 4:23:55

DR. CURRY: I don't.

559 4:23:56

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. But you've never been asked to meet with a client and his counsel before being retained as an expert, either before or after, have you?

560 4:24:05
561 4:24:06

MS. BREDEHOFT: And you justified that it was okay in this case because it was a high-profile case?

562 4:24:11

DR. CURRY: That's not quite right. I justified it, in this case, actually, I sought consultation about it. First of all, the person who had about it. First of all, the person who had retained his attorneys was unable to come to my office with his attorneys, and, yes, this is a very visible case, it's been going on a very long time, and I understood that there would be a need to interview me and determine - make an informed decision about my qualifications.

563 4:24:44

MS. BREDEHOFT: Can you look at page 240, please. Line 3 is my question. "Would you agree it's highly irregular to meet with a subject in a litigation?"

564 4:25:01

MS. BREDEHOFT: And your answer, on that occasion, was "I would not say it's highly irregular. I would say it's not something that I would typically do. However, I had not yet been retained on the case. This was a large, high-profile case, and I understood that I believed that it was appropriate for a person retaining me with such a high profile to meet me, able to vet me, essentially, with the attorneys present prior to retaining me on his case."

565 4:25:25

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall that?

566 4:25:26

DR. CURRY: Yes.

567 4:25:27

MS. BREDEHOFT: That's what you said under oath, April 26, 2022 I correct?

568 4:25:28

DR. CURRY: Yes.

569 4:25:28

MS. BREDEHOFT: And then I said, "Had you ever done that before?"

570 4:25:30

MS. BREDEHOFT: And you said, "No," correct? ,6

571 4:25:31

DR. CURRY: Correct.

572 4:25:32

MS. BREDEHOFT: And then I said, "Have you ever done it Is since?"

573 4:25:35

MS. BREDEHOFT: And you said, "No," correct?

574 4:25:37

DR. CURRY: Correct.

575 4:25:40

MS. BREDEHOFT: Now, would you agree that if you did I not find something that would be in favor of Mr. Depp and negative to Ms. Heard, that you wouldn't be an expert in this case?

576 4:25:50

DR. CURRY: That's not true.

577 4:25:59

MS. BREDEHOFT: You're not coming into court if you're going to say Ms. Heard is right and Mr. Depp is wrong, correct?

578 4:26:04

DR. CURRY: So, as a forensic psychologist, my obligation is to the Court, is to the fact finder. I present science, regardless of what that science may be. Now, when I take a case, my retainer may be. Now, when I take a case, my retainer I agreement is explicit about that and - d I'S

579 4:26:19

MS. BREDEHOFT: Dr. Curry, I'm just asking you, I'm asking you a question. I'd like you to try to answer my question.

580 4:26:22

DR. CURRY: Okay.

581 4:26:24

MS. BREDEHOFT: You understand that if you found you wouldn't be here, right, you wouldn't be favorably to Ms. Heard and negatively to Mr. Depp, testifying?

582 4:26:28

MR. DENNISON: Objection. Speculative.

583 4:26:31

DR. CURRY: No, I would - sorry.

584 4:26:35

THE COURT: The objection is speculation?

585 4:26:39

MS. BREDEHOFT: That's not speculation.

586 4:26:40

THE COURT: I'll sustain the objection.

587 4:26:41

THE COURT: If you want to ask it differently.

588 4:26:52

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. That goes to bias, Your Honor.

589 4:26:54

THE COURT: I sustained the objection.

590 4:26:55

THE COURT: Next question.

591 4:26:58

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right.

592 4:26:59

MS. BREDEHOFT: You were, in fact, so excited about being involved in this case that you told your husband, even though this was a highly confidential matter, that you were going to be conducting the examination of Ms. Heard, didn't

593 4:27:13

DR. CURRY: That is not accurate.

594 4:27:14

MS. BREDEHOFT: You not only told your husband but you told Ms. Heard that you told your husband, correct?

595 4:27:20

DR. CURRY: Ms. Bredehoft, that is not accurate.

596 4:27:21

MS. BREDEHOFT: What is accurate?

597 4:27:24

DR. CURRY: You're incorrect. That is not correct.

598 4:27:26

MS. BREDEHOFT: Is your testimony today, under oath, that you did not tell your husband that you were going to be conducting the examination of Amber?

599 4:27:31

DR. CURRY: That is my testimony.

600 4:27:41

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Let's go to page 306.

601 4:28:15

MS. BREDEHOFT: So the question that was asked was because you brought muffins, you said, from your husband, right, and you gave those to Ms. Heard, correct?

602 4:28:25

DR. CURRY: May I clarify what occurred so we can stop talking about muffins? What happened was that I was getting ready that morning, I frequently bring muffins to the office, my husband did happen to know that there was going to be a celebrity client coming in because on the morning that that occurs, which often occurs, we have to actually clear the office and move the staff to the other office. So, yes, on the one hand, he was aware of that. I was getting ready. I asked him to go to the bakery near our house and pick up the muffins for me because I was running late. He often has to do that because I often do run late.

603 4:28:59

DR. CURRY: He brought the muffins back to the house, I brought them into the office, Ms. Heard and I enjoyed the muffins together. I think I made the comment to her along the lines, like, we can thank my husband - or my husband got these for us today, meaning he purchased the muffins, we are now enjoying them because of him

604 4:29:17

MS. BREDEHOFT: Did you say, on pages 305 and 306, that you frequently have examinations of high-profile p , us?

605 4:29:27

DR. CURRY: 305 and 306?

606 4:29:27

MS. BREDEHOFT: Yeah, that's where we're talking about.

607 4:29:30

DR. CURRY: Is there a line you want me to look at?

608 4:29:32

MS. BREDEHOFT: You can start with 15, line 15,305. Just read through that and tell me whether you said, anywhere in there, that you have a lot of high-profile examinations, you do this frequently?

609 4:29:40

MR. DENNISON: Objection. Improper I impeachment.

610 4:29:48

MS. BREDEHOFT: I don't agree.

611 4:29:48

THE COURT: I want you to approach, please.

612

[STAGE DIRECTION]: (Sidebar.)

613 4:29:48

THE COURT: Which statement are you trying to impeach here?

614 4:29:48

MS. BREDEHOFT: I'm trying to 1118 impeach -- she added into, the one that's on page 304 to 306, she added in that she has lots of high-profile clients that she does this for, closes the office. She doesn't say that in there.

615 4:29:48

THE COURT: Why don't you ask you 1. didn't say that before --

616 4:29:56

MS. BREDEHOFT: I'll ask her.

617 4:30:03

THE COURT: I don't know.

618 4:30:10

MS. BREDEHOFT: It starts on page 305 and then her answer is on 306. She doesn't say in there that she sees lots of high-profile clients. She added it in there. She added she has many high-profile clients.

619 4:30:17

MR. DENNISON: The way to answer the question exactly the way opposing counsel suggests. If she wants to ask the question about whether you said that before --

620 4:30:24

THE COURT: You mentioned that.

621 4:30:31

MS. BREDEHOFT: I will.

622 4:30:39

THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.

623

[STAGE DIRECTION]: (Open court.)

624

[SECTION HEADER]: BY MS. BREDEHOFT:

625 4:30:46

MS. BREDEHOFT: So, why did your husband get the ! 19 muffins for Amber Heard?

626 4:30:50

DR. CURRY: He did not get the muffins for Amber Heard

627 4:30:55

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. He knew you had a high-profile client and you were preparing for a very long time, and you asked him to pick up the muffins, correct?

628 4:31:03

DR. CURRY: I asked him to pick up the muffins for me, yes.

629 4:31:09

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now, would you agree that domestic abuse can be verbal?

630 4:31:13

DR. CURRY: Absolutely. Yes.

631 4:31:14

MS. BREDEHOFT: Would you agree that domestic abuse can be emotional?

632 4:31:17

DR. CURRY: Yes, certainly.

633 4:31:18

MS. BREDEHOFT: Would you agree that domestic abuse can be psychological?

634 4:31:21

DR. CURRY: Yes.

635 4:31:22

MS. BREDEHOFT: Would you agree that domestic abuse can be physical?

636 4:31:25

DR. CURRY: Yes.

637 4:31:26

MS. BREDEHOFT: Now, you indicated, and I believe you testified in your direct, that it is very important to review the treatment records before forming opinions; is that correct?

638 4:31:34

DR. CURRY: Yes.

639 4:31:35

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. In fact, that's the first thing part of the evaluation.

640 4:31:47

MS. BREDEHOFT: Let's go to page 261. And let's go to 260, because that's where I start the question. you would do, correct?

641 4:32:00

DR. CURRY: Not necessarily the first, but it's The question I asked was, "Do you recall whether you reviewed any of these designations on February 19, 2021 ?"

642 4:32:08

DR. CURRY: And you said, "Okay. I can't say for certain. What I can tell you is that knowing my normal procedure, I would have reviewed the treatment records first."

643 4:32:15

DR. CURRY: Did you testify to that under oath then?

644 4:32:18

DR. CURRY: Yes.

645 4:32:18

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now, before we start getting into the ones that you testified about, I just want to be really clear about what you actually have as an opinion with respect to the borderline personality disorder and the histrionic. You didn't diagnose, you didn't actually have a DSM-5 diagnosis that Amber Heard suffers from either borderline personality disorder or histrionic personality disorder, correct?

646 4:32:48

DR. CURRY: That's not correct.

647 4:32:51

MS. BREDEHOFT: In fact, your report says Ms. Heard demonstrates psychological symptoms of a combined borderline and histrionic personality disorder; would you agree?

648 4:33:03

DR. CURRY: Yes, I did say that. And also, what designation was that, I believe January 18th, that report was included? Yes.

649 4:33:12

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And that's what you said, at ! that time, correct?

650 4:33:14

DR. CURRY: Yes.

651 4:33:15
652 4:33:15

DR. CURRY: I said a little bit more than that, as well.

653 4:33:20

MS. BREDEHOFT: You said, and I'll read it, I'll quote it, "Based on the combined results of my interview with Ms. Heard, behavioral observations, psychometric test data and review of the available records, Ms. Heard demonstrates psychological symptoms of a combined borderline and histrionic personality disorder, BHPD.

654 4:33:31

DR. CURRY: Yes.

655 4:33:42

MS. BREDEHOFT: That's what you wrote in your report as Is one of your conclusions, correct?

656 4:33:47

DR. CURRY: And that's the DSM-5 diagnosis.

657 4:33:50

MS. BREDEHOFT: And it did not say that you were diagnosing with the DSM-5 for borderline personality disorder or histrionic personality disorder, did it?

658 4:33:59

DR. CURRY: That's what it says in different semantics.

659 4:34:04

MS. BREDEHOFT: Oh, so what you meant to say?

660 4:34:06

DR. CURRY: It did not use the words you just said.

661 4:34:11

MS. BREDEHOFT: Now, let's talk about the treatment records that you said that you reviewed. But I'm going to start with Rocky Pennington. Your testimony was that, out of the blue, Amber hit Rocky Pennington, correct?

662 4:34:25

DR. CURRY: I can't remember exactly what I said. 1121 But I did reference Ms. Pennington's deposition, that Ms. Heard struck Ms. Pennington in the face.

663 4:34:33

MS. BREDEHOFT: In fact, Ms. Pennington testified that she hit Ms. Heard, and in response to that, she can't recall, but Ms. Heard either pushed or slapped her, correct?

664 4:34:45

DR. CURRY: I don't recall.

665 4:34:46

MS. BREDEHOFT: That's a pretty important distinction; don't you think?

666 4:34:50

DR. CURRY: My recollection is that there was some sort of violence both ways in the relationship. Either way, it seemed that both of them might have been unstable, but I was only evaluating Ms. Heard.

667 4:35:00

MS. BREDEHOFT: Oh, so, now we have an evaluation of Rocky Pennington?

668 4:35:02

DR. CURRY: No. I just said that that was not relevant to my opinion because I'm only evaluating Ms. Heard.

669 4:35:07

MS. BREDEHOFT: But you testified to that on direct, that that was a factor, right?

670 4:35:11

DR. CURRY: Yes.

671 4:35:12

MS. BREDEHOFT: Well, wouldn't it make a big difference if Amber struck first or just responded back?

672 4:35:20

DR. CURRY: Given the dynamic, not necessarily. No, it would not have.

673 4:35:23

MS. BREDEHOFT: So now you're an expert on Rocky Pennington and her dynamics with Amber Heard?

674 4:35:25

MR. DENNISON: Objection. Argumentative.

675 4:35:26

MS. BREDEHOFT: I'll withdraw.

676 4:35:28

THE COURT: Sustained.

677 4:35:30
678 4:35:30

MS. BREDEHOFT: So, now, let's talk about Dr. Cowan. You not only reviewed his treatment records and his text messages and documents, but you also attended his deposition; did you not?

679 4:35:44

DR. CURRY: Yes.

680 4:35:45

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And do you recall Dr. Cowan testifying that Amber told him about Depp physically abusing her, contemporaneous with the events?

681 4:35:56

DR. CURRY: I don't recall, specifically, his words, but I remember him recalling that she had disclosed abuse in their treatment, yes.

682 4:36:07

MS. BREDEHOFT: And do you recall Dr. Cowan testifying I that he received a text message, contemporaneous, that Johnny did a number on me tonight. I'm safe in my support tonight, but I need some real help.

683 4:36:17

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you remember him testifying to that?

684 4:36:19

DR. CURRY: I don't remember the testimony, but I do remember seeing that text message as one of the exhibits.

685 4:36:24

MS. BREDEHOFT: And do you remember Dr. Cowan testifying that on another occasion, Amber sent him a text, "Johnny beat me up pretty good last night"?

686 4:36:30

MR. DENNISON: Objection. Hearsay.

687 4:36:35

MS. BREDEHOFT: Not in this -- she can rely on it.

688 4:36:37

THE COURT: Overruled.

689 4:36:39

MS. BREDEHOFT: Thank you. Thank you, Your Honor. I didn't mean to argue that far, I guess.

690 4:36:44

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall that?

691 4:36:45

DR. CURRY: Again, I don't recall the testimony, but I do remember that being an exhibit. I've seen it.

692 4:36:49

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall Dr. Cowan testifying that not only did he believe Amber in her reporting of the abuse by Depp, but that she had no ulterior motive?

693 4:36:59

DR. CURRY: I actually don't recall that I'm not saying that it didn't occur.

694 4:37:03

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall Dr. Cowan testifying that Is he believed the relationship was toxic and he was concerned for Amber's physical well-being?

695 4:37:14

DR. CURRY: I do recall him saying that he believed Ill the relationship was toxic.

696 4:37:19

MS. BREDEHOFT: And you don't recall Dr. Cowan --

697 4:37:20

DR. CURRY: I do not.

698 4:37:21

MS. BREDEHOFT: Saying that he was concerned for Amber's physical well-being?

699 4:37:24

DR. CURRY: I don't remember those exact words.

700 4:37:28

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you believe -- do you recall Dr. Cowan testifying, in that deposition that you were present for, referring to Mr. Depp, his controlling nature, jealousy, and suspiciousness, addiction to drugs and alcohol and violent and indulgent temper? Do you recall him using those terms to describe Mr. Depp?

701 4:37:48

DR. CURRY: I remember thinking that would be an inappropriate impression for a treating provider of a different person to give. But I do recall him making that statement

702 4:37:58

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall Dr. Cowan testifying that if he pushed her, she was going to push him back, and I never had the impression that she was the provocateur, but that she was indicating to me she IO had a hard time, you know, deescalating these types of situation?

703 4:38:06

DR. CURRY: Yes.

704 4:38:13

MS. BREDEHOFT: And do you also recall him saying that she didn't say she pushed him, she just said, I got right back up. She told me that he pushed her down and she got back -- right back up.

705 4:38:26

DR. CURRY: I remember him saying that Ms. Heard told him that, yes.

706 4:38:29

MS. BREDEHOFT: And do you recall him testifying, you could interpret it that way, I kind of interpreted more, you know, metaphorically, that when somebody comes at her, she goes back at them, you know, in a similar way, whether it's verbally or she protects herself.

707 4:38:37

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall that?

708 4:38:45

DR. CURRY: I may - I recall something along those lines, but it was a six or seven-hour deposition, so the specifics are not fresh in my mind.

709 4:38:52

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall Dr. Cowan specifically testifying that he believed Amber Heard when she reported the physical abuse by Mr. Depp?

710 4:39:00

DR. CURRY: I recall him saying that and following it up with a statement that you have to take the patient at their word when you're the therapist.

711 4:39:08

MS. BREDEHOFT: You recall that?

712 4:39:10

DR. CURRY: Yes.

713 4:39:10

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall him saying he took her -- that he believed her? That he found her believable?

714 4:39:15

DR. CURRY: Yes, yes, that he found her believable.

715 4:39:17

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now, you also testified about Amy Banks.

716 4:39:21

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall that?

717 4:39:22

DR. CURRY: Yes.

718 4:39:23

MS. BREDEHOFT: And before we go there. Dr. Cowan has been a clinical psychologist for 40 years, correct?

719 4:39:29

DR. CURRY: I'm not sure.

720 4:39:30

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Well, he testified to that, didn't he, in the deposition?

721 4:39:32

DR. CURRY: I don't recall.

722 4:39:33

MS. BREDEHOFT: And he also saw Amber Heard for over two years, correct?

723 4:39:38

DR. CURRY: Yes.

724 4:39:39

MS. BREDEHOFT: From 2014, approximately, August 2014 through 2016, correct?

725 4:39:45

DR. CURRY: Yes, he did.

726 4:39:46

MS. BREDEHOFT: For a period of time; would you agree?

727 4:39:47

DR. CURRY: Uh-huh.

728 4:39:48

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And he also testified that he did not diagnose Amber with borderline personality disorder.

729 4:39:55

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall that testimony?

730 4:39:56

DR. CURRY: He also testified that he doesn't use diagnoses. But, yes, I do recall that.

731 4:40:01

MS. BREDEHOFT: And do you recall that it was in those words were in his notes, but he said he had written that down but then he discounted it and determined that that was not correct for her?

732 4:40:11

MR. DENNISON: Objection, You Honor.

733 4:40:20

THE COURT: Do you want to approach?

734

[STAGE DIRECTION]: (Sidebar.)

735 4:40:23

THE COURT: Yes, sir.

736 4:40:26

MR. DENNISON: So many elements to that question that I couldn't follow it.

737 4:40:29

MS. BREDEHOFT: I'll withdraw that one.

738 4:40:32

THE COURT: Okay.

739

[STAGE DIRECTION]: (Open court.)

740

[Section Header]: BY MS. BREDEHOFT:

741 4:40:35

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now let's jump to Amy Banks. Dr. Banks is a psychologist, correct?

742 4:40:39

DR. CURRY: Yes.

743 4:40:40

MS. BREDEHOFT: In fact, she went to medical school at Georgetown and she did her psychiatric training at Harvard Medical School, correct?

744 4:40:46

DR. CURRY: I believe that's correct. I don't recall a hundred percent.

745 4:40:52

MS. BREDEHOFT: She was a psychiatrist in Massachusetts that Amber Heard had reached out to.

746 4:40:54

DR. CURRY: Yes.

747 4:40:57

MS. BREDEHOFT: After the Australia incident, to try to help her relationship with Mr. Depp, correct?

748 4:41:01

MR. DENNISON: Objection, Your Honor.

749 4:41:05

MS. BREDEHOFT: Let me back up.

750 4:41:06

MS. BREDEHOFT: You attended Dr. Banks' deposition as well; did you not?

751 4:41:09

DR. CURRY: Yes, I did

752 4:41:10

MS. BREDEHOFT: And Dr. Banks testified to that, correct?

753 4:41:14

DR. CURRY: I don't remember if she testified to that. I don't have the notes right in front of me or the deposition transcript.

754 4:41:20

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right. Do you recall Dr. Banks testifying that she understood that Amber was in a relationship with Johnny Depp that had gotten violent and out of control?

755 4:41:35

DR. CURRY: I don't recall specifically, no.

756 4:41:37

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall Amy Banks testifying that they had physical altercations and his drug use had escalated and Amber felt she was at risk?

757 4:41:48

DR. CURRY: I don't recall.

758 4:41:50

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall Amy Banks testifying that Amber was reporting the violence by Mr. Depp and it was not consensual?

759 4:41:58

DR. CURRY: I recall Dr. Banks stating that Ms. Heard was reporting violence to her, yes. I do not recall a statement about consent.

760 4:42:10

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall Dr. Banks testifying that there was discussion about Mr. Depp cutting off his finger, and she said only that it was the middle of one of these very kind of out-of-contra escalated fights and that did make a fairly big impact on me?

761 4:42:30

DR. CURRY: I remember something like that.

762 4:42:32

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right. And do you recall Dr. Banks saying it was a whole other level, as I remember it, he told me he actually cut off a part of his finger during one of these altercations, meaning, to me, the way I digested that, if you will, was that things had gotten particularly out of control?

763 4:42:51

DR. CURRY: I do not recall that exact statement. I'm not saying it didn't occur. I just can't recall it.

764 4:42:56

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right. And you recall that Mr. Depp was in sessions with Ms. Heard with Dr. Banks, correct?

765 4:43:03

DR. CURRY: I-yes.

766 4:43:04
767 4:43:05

DR. CURRY: My understanding, however, is that they met with Dr. Banks, and then it was primarily Ms. Heard meeting with Dr. Banks for treatment after prescriptions and therapy.

768 4:43:14

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right. And do you recall Dr. Banks saying that she was not surprised that Amber was seeking a restraining order because of the violence that she knew existed in the relationship?

769 4:43:27

DR. CURRY: I do recall that. And it would be impossible to know that violence exists, as a treating therapist or as a psychologist. Again, we're not investigators. However, I do recall that she said that because I remember having that thought.

770 4:43:40

MS. BREDEHOFT: And do you recall Amy Banks -- and she's a psychiatrist, right?

771 4:43:43

DR. CURRY: Psychiatrist.

772 4:43:45

MS. BREDEHOFT: Right. Is Do you recall Amy Banks saying that it was clear to her that Mr. Depp was the one who Is lo initiated the violence?

773 4:43:51

DR. CURRY: I don't recall that.

774 4:43:56

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right. Do you recall that Dr. Banks said that she knew, for certain, that Mr. Depp was the one who had committed the violence because Ms. Heard reported it in the presence of Mr. Depp and he did not contradict?

775 4:44:16

DR. CURRY: I do not recall that.

776 4:44:20

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Do you recall that Dr. Banks ultimately s concluded that it was her belief that Amber was a victim of domestic violence at the hands of Mr. Depp?

777 4:44:24

MR. DENNISON: Objection, Your Honor.

778 4:44:29

THE COURT: Yes, do you want to approach?

779

[STAGE DIRECTION]: (Sidebar.)

780 4:44:33

THE COURT: Yes, sir.

781 4:44:37

MR. DENNISON: I understand the desire to get in the expert testimony, but that's going to come in. All she's asking about is whether she recalls certain statements --

782 4:44:42

THE COURT: What's the objection?

783 4:44:46

MR. DENNISON: The objection is duplicative of -- I'm sorry. It's speculative given the lack of clear foundation.

784 4:44:50

THE COURT: You can redirect her on that. That's fine. I'll allow the questions.

785 4:44:55

THE COURT: I assume you're near the end of those questions?

786 4:44:59

MS. BREDEHOFT: Excuse me.

787 4:45:03

THE COURT: I'm assuming you're near the end of those questions?

788 4:45:07

MS. BREDEHOFT: Yes. I'm going to be going to something different.

789 4:45:12

THE COURT: All right. I've gotcha.

790

[STAGE DIRECTION]: (Open court.)

791 4:45:16

MS. BREDEHOFT: And what was your answer to that last one, I'm sorry?

792 4:45:19

DR. CURRY: I think I can't recall, but I also can't recall that last question.

793 4:45:23

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall that Dr. Banks concluded that Amber was a victim of domestic violence at the hands of Mr. Depp?

794 4:45:30

DR. CURRY: I don't recall that.

795 4:45:36

MS. BREDEHOFT: You also reviewed the records of Laurel Anderson, and you reviewed her deposition; is that correct?

796 4:45:43

DR. CURRY: Let me refresh my memory for a moment.

797 4:45:49

DR. CURRY: I reviewed Dr. Anderson's deposition, yes.

798 4:45:51

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And do you recall that she reported that Amber Heard had reported physical violence by Mr. Depp to her?

799 4:45:59

DR. CURRY: I recall that she said that Ms. Heard had reported that, yes.

800 4:46:02

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And do you recall that she said that it changed over time?

801 4:46:08

DR. CURRY: I don't recall that specifically.

802 4:46:11

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And do you recall Dr. Anderson saying that she had witnessed her face being bruised after the December 15, 2015 incident?

803 4:46:19

DR. CURRY: I don't recall that.

804 4:46:20

MS. BREDEHOFT: You don't recall that, okay. And do you recall that Dr. Anderson said that Amber had reported that he had pulled out her hair, bruised her face, kicked her leg, and hit her in the head?

805 4:46:39

DR. CURRY: Yes, Ms. Heard did report that to her, according to her testimony.

806 4:46:42

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And do you recall that Amber Heard said that Mr. Depp was scaring her?

807 4:46:49

DR. CURRY: I don't recall that specifically.

808 4:46:51

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And do you recall that Dr. Anderson said she believed that Amber Heard I 1 s was a victim of domestic abuse at the hands of 1119 Mr. Depp? ,20

809 4:47:01

DR. CURRY: I recall - no, I don't recall that I statement.

810 4:47:05

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right. Let's go to Bonnie Jacobs. You said that you reviewed the notes from Bonnie Jacobs, correct?

811 4:47:14

DR. CURRY: Yes.

812 4:47:16

MS. BREDEHOFT: And what you testified to was that you discounted these because the first notes from Bonnie Jacobs indicated that she already had all of these symptoms, correct?

813 4:47:30

DR. CURRY: Just, I'm sorry, I don't understand

814 4:47:32

DR. CURRY: What you're saying. I discounted?

815 4:47:33

MS. BREDEHOFT: Tell me why you discounted Bonnie Jacobs' notes.

816 4:47:37

DR. CURRY: I did not discount Bonnie Jacobs' notes.

817 4:47:41

MS. BREDEHOFT: You said that she -- that Bonnie ! Jacobs, in her notes, had already determined that . the symptoms were present for Amber Heard before the relationship with Mr. Depp; did you not?

818 4:47:53

DR. CURRY: What I recall saying was that within Dr. Jacobs' notes, she's documented instances in which Ms. Heard reported to her, over the course ,21 of therapy, that she was experiencing nightmares, I recurrent nightmares, in fact, about childhood

819 4:48:12

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now, the very first entry on Bonnie Jacobs' notes, and these are the notes, right? Do you recognize these?

820 4:48:20

DR. CURRY: I do. And we received more sort of at the tail end, just a couple months ago.

821 4:48:25

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right. So the first of Bonnie Jacobs' notes is on 10/17/2011.

822 4:48:30

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall that?

823 4:48:32

DR. CURRY: I don't recall the exact date. I don't have anything in front of me.

824 4:48:35

MS. BREDEHOFT: And she was already, Amber Heard, was already in the relationship with Johnny Depp at this point; was she not?

825 4:48:42

DR. CURRY: I believe she was, yes.

826 4:48:44

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And in Bonnie Jacobs' notes, she documents --

827 4:48:49

DR. CURRY: However - oh, go ahead.

828 4:48:51

MS. BREDEHOFT: She documents multiple, multiple occasions that Amber Heard reports, to her, physical violence upon her by Mr. Depp; does she not?

829 4:49:01

DR. CURRY: There are several notes that indicate that Ms. Heard has reported violence by Mr. Depp yes.

830 4:49:07

MS. BREDEHOFT: Many, many, correct?

831 4:49:09

DR. CURRY: I wouldn't quantify it as "many, many."

832 4:49:12

DR. CURRY: I'm not sure what you mean by "many, many."

833 4:49:14

MS. BREDEHOFT: How many would you say?

834 4:49:15

DR. CURRY: I don't know. I don't have the notes in front of me.

835 4:49:17

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Well, what do you recall in deciding to make your opinions in this case?

836 4:49:22

DR. CURRY: Well, I'm confused about the dates because I know that Dr. Jacobs treated Ms. Heard even while she was in her prior relationship, leaving her prior relationship with her last wife.

837 4:49:33

MS. BREDEHOFT: Dr. Curry, I'm not going to ask you to try to bring in extraneous things. I'm asking you what you recall of these notes.

838 4:49:38

DR. CURRY: But the dates would have been different, based on that alone.

839 4:49:42
840 4:49:42

DR. CURRY: And I recall that there was quite a bit of information because these were copious notes spanning back in time from her relationship with Tasya.

841 4:49:51

MS. BREDEHOFT: Dr. Curry, please, answer my question. How many occasions do you recall Dr. --

842 4:49:58

DR. CURRY: I don't know.

843 4:49:59

MS. BREDEHOFT: Dr. Jacobs documenting Amber reporting physical abuse?

844 4:50:07

DR. CURRY: I don't know.

845 4:50:13

MS. BREDEHOFT: Now, you also said that you listened to I audiotapes, correct?

846 4:50:19

DR. CURRY: Yes.

847 4:50:20

MS. BREDEHOFT: Did you hear Mr. Depp admitting to headbutting Ms. Heard?

848 4:50:25

DR. CURRY: That is not what I heard.

849 4:50:26

MS. BREDEHOFT: You didn't hear that?

850 4:50:28

DR. CURRY: I heard a conversation about headbutting. I did not hear him, as you said, admit to headbutting Ms. Heard.

851 4:50:33

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. That's your characterization of it, correct?

852 4:50:36

DR. CURRY: Yes.

853 4:50:37

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Did you see the videotape of Mr. Depp in the kitchen?

854 4:50:42

DR. CURRY: Yes.

855 4:50:42

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Did Ms. Heard imagine that or create that or was she responsible for that somehow?

856 4:50:46

MR. DENNISON: Objection, Your Honor. Speculative.

857 4:50:51

THE COURT: I'll sustain the objection.

858 4:50:51

THE COURT: Next question.

859 4:50:52
860 4:50:54

MS. BREDEHOFT: What, if any, impact did that have on d I your opinions, watching Mr. Depp in that video?

861 4:51:02

DR. CURRY: I'm not sure - it was one of many pieces of the exhibits and other collateral data that I considered. I'm not sure what the direct impact was or if that could be measured.

862 4:51:16

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right. Now, counsel asked you whether you had conducted any type of examination

863 4:51:24
864 4:51:25

MS. BREDEHOFT: You did not review any medical records or psychological records from Mr. Depp either, did you?

865 4:51:31

DR. CURRY: I reviewed all of the records that were available.

866 4:51:34

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall reviewing medical and psychological records of Mr. Depp?

867 4:51:39

DR. CURRY: I-yes.

868 4:51:40

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall Dr. Blaustein referring to Mr. Depp having rage?

869 4:51:47

DR. CURRY: No, I actually recall him referring to Ms. Heard in that note.

870 4:51:52

MS. BREDEHOFT: Your testimony is that Dr. Blaustein was referring to Amber Heard as having rage?

871 4:51:59

DR. CURRY: I transcribed several of the notes and I may be missing a time when he - said that about Mr. Depp. The handwriting was very difficult to transcribe, but there was one instance in which I recall transcribing him stating that Mr. Depp reported that Ms. Heard had rage.

872 4:52:19

MS. BREDEHOFT: Dr. Blaustein's deposition was taken; was it not?

873 4:52:26

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall -- so I take it, then, you don't recall him testifying that Mr. Depp told him he had rage and demons?

874 4:52:34

DR. CURRY: I don't recall.

875 4:52:35

DR. CURRY: I don't recall.

876 4:52:36

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Do you recall Dr. Blaustein testifying that Mr. Depp looked at his wife, Amber, like his mother or his sister that he didn't like?

877 4:52:46

DR. CURRY: I haven't seen his deposition. I don't recall that.

878 4:52:50

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now, did you see and do you know whether Mr. Depp has ever been diagnosed with any personality disorders?

879 4:52:58

DR. CURRY: My- that's not relevant to my task to conduct an evaluation of Ms. Heard. So I do not know that he has had one. It's not in the records that he did.

880 4:53:07

MS. BREDEHOFT: So, one way or the other, you don't know whether Mr. Depp suffers from any personality disorders?

881 4:53:13

DR. CURRY: There was - that's not my task.

882 4:53:16

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Let me go to IPV perpetrators. , Would you agree that accusations of infidelity can be considered one of the characteristics of a personality perpetrator of IPV?

883 4:53:25
884 4:53:33

DR. CURRY: It can be a characteristic of a lot of things. It is something that can be weaponized if somebody is trying to or is having rage towards their partner.

885 4:53:45

MS. BREDEHOFT: Let's go to page 270.

886 4:54:00

MS. BREDEHOFT: Line 3, my question was, "Are accusations of infidelity considered one of the characteristics of a perpetrator, a personality perpetrator of IPV?"

887 4:54:06

MR. DENNISON: Objection, Your Honor.

888 4:54:11

THE COURT: The objection?

889 4:54:17

MR. DENNISON: The question is vague and ultimately ambiguous.

890 4:54:22

MS. BREDEHOFT: I don't understand the ! objection.

891 4:54:23

THE COURT: I'll overrule the I objection.

892 4:54:24

MS. BREDEHOFT: Is was.

893 4:54:25

MS. BREDEHOFT: And your answer, under oath -- Can you remind me of the page? Page 270, line 3 was where my question

894 4:54:32

DR. CURRY: Okay.

895 4:54:32

MS. BREDEHOFT: And your answer's at line 8.

896 4:54:34

MS. BREDEHOFT: You said, "It can be," correct?

897 4:54:37

DR. CURRY: Uh-huh, yes.

898 4:54:37

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And interrogating your partner about unfounded accusations of infidelity can be abusive; would you agree?

899 4:54:45

DR. CURRY: It can be, if they're unfounded, yes.

900 4:54:49

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And psychological consequences for a victim of IPV can include diminished self-esteem, correct?

901 4:55:01

DR. CURRY: Yes.

902 4:55:02

MS. BREDEHOFT: Depressed mood?

903 4:55:03

DR. CURRY: Yes.

904 4:55:04

MS. BREDEHOFT: Anxiety?

905 4:55:05

DR. CURRY: Yes.

906 4:55:06

MS. BREDEHOFT: Fearfulness?

907 4:55:07

DR. CURRY: Certainly.

908 4:55:07

MS. BREDEHOFT: Diminished self-agency?

909 4:55:10

DR. CURRY: Yes.

910 4:55:10

MS. BREDEHOFT: Feeling powerless?

911 4:55:12

DR. CURRY: Yes.

912 4:55:12

MS. BREDEHOFT: Loss of sleep?

913 4:55:15

DR. CURRY: Yes.

914 4:55:15

MS. BREDEHOFT: And IPV is a traumatic stressor; would you agree?

915 4:55:18

DR. CURRY: It is.

916 4:55:19

MS. BREDEHOFT: And IPV is capable of resulting in PTSD; is it not?

917 4:55:23

DR. CURRY: It is.

918 4:55:24

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And IPV is capable of resulting in other trauma-based disorders, correct?

919 4:55:32

DR. CURRY: Yes.

920 4:55:35

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now, Amber's medical

921

[SECTION HEADER]: Examination, she was cooperative, correct.

922 4:55:42

DR. CURRY: Her psychological? Yes. She was cooperative and polite.

923 4:55:46

MS. BREDEHOFT: And in the two full days of

924

[SECTION HEADER]: Examination, you felt she was polite and answered

925 4:55:50

MS. BREDEHOFT: All your questions, except in one instance where she furrowed her brow when you were asking about friendships in high school, correct?

926 4:55:58

DR. CURRY: That's not correct.

927 4:56:00

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right. Let's go to page 275.

928 4:56:20

MS. BREDEHOFT: So we start on 274 with the, was she polite? You said yes. Was she cooperative? Yes.

929 4:56:33

MS. BREDEHOFT: And then my question was. "Did she, at any time, become combative or unfriendly with you or angry?"

930 4:56:39

MS. BREDEHOFT: And your answer was, "There was one instance in which she appeared annoyed and the posturing forward a bit, more assertive tone, furrowed brow when I was questioning something, following up on data that had been inconsistent about friendships in high school. Other than that, she was very polite."

931 4:56:56

MS. BREDEHOFT: Is that your answer at that time?

932 4:56:57

DR. CURRY: That was my answer at that time. And I, it's inconsistent with the question you had just asked me.

933 4:57:03

MS. BREDEHOFT: And would you agree that appearing for this examination with an expert who had been

934 4:57:14

DR. CURRY: Yes.

935 4:57:14

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And, in fact, not only had you been retained by Mr. Depp, but what had been communicated by Mr. Depp's team was that you had called Amber Heard a liar and a perpetrator of abuse, correct?

936 4:57:28

DR. CURRY: First of all, I would like to clarify that I was not retained by Mr. Depp, I was retained by Mr. Depp's counsel. And what I can say that, yes, any examinee, in a forensic context, you would consider that they're probably stressed.

937 4:57:46

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right. Would you agree that all perpetrators of IPV have anger management issues?

938 4:57:55

DR. CURRY: Yes.

939 4:57:56

MS. BREDEHOFT: And a large portion of IPV perpetrators i have substance abuse issues?

940 4:58:03

DR. CURRY: Not - it's one of many factors that correlates with intimate partner violence, but there are certainly many people who perpetuate intimate partner violence who do not have substance abuse issues.

941 4:58:15

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right. Let's go to line 17, what I have here. And I'm talking about you said, and just to give context, remember I was asking you how many, what percentage of people you treat that are perpetrators, and you said 5 percent. Do you recall that? Just for substance.

942 4:58:49

DR. CURRY: I see that here.

943 4:58:50

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And then I said, "Of the 5 percent that are IPV perpetrators that you've treated over the last eight years, how many of these perpetrators have substance abuse issues?" And your answer was?

944 4:59:04

DR. CURRY: I see that I answered with a figure of speech, a large portion.

945 4:59:08

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Thank you.

946 4:59:09

MS. BREDEHOFT: And it's common for the perpetrator to essentially gaslight the victim, accuse them of being the perpetrator; would you agree?

947 4:59:17

DR. CURRY: Are you in a different area or are you asking me a different question?

948 4:59:18

MS. BREDEHOFT: I'm asking you a question. And it's common-- IO

949 4:59:22

DR. CURRY: Can you, please, repeat that?

950 4:59:23
951 4:59:23

MS. BREDEHOFT: And it's common for the perpetrator to essentially gaslight the victim, accuse them of being the perpetrator; would you agree?

952 4:59:29

MR. DENNISON: Objection. Compound.

953 4:59:34

MS. BREDEHOFT: That's exactly how it was asked in the deposition.

954 4:59:36

THE COURT: It is a compound question. I'll sustain the objection.

955 4:59:38
956 4:59:39

MS. BREDEHOFT: Is it common for the perpetrator to essentially gaslight -- I don't think that's --

957 4:59:44

MS. BREDEHOFT: Your Honor, I think it's just one question. Let me try it.

958 4:59:49

MS. BREDEHOFT: To gaslight the victim, isn't it?

959 4:59:51

DR. CURRY: That's a characteristic of psychological abuse, yes.

960 4:59:55

MS. BREDEHOFT: And it's common, then, for them to accuse them of being the perpetrator, the victim?

961 4:59:59

DR. CURRY: That's a characteristic of abuse from women perpetrated against men. It's actually very common. About 90 percent of male victims of IPV have reported that a female partner who abuses them makes threats to report their partner as an abuser. It's less common for men to make that statement to female partners, just because there's less potential consequences.

962 5:00:26

MS. BREDEHOFT: Isn't it true, though, that some form of gas lighting is often present in these personality-based IPV scenarios?

963 5:00:35

DR. CURRY: Yes.

964 5:00:36

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And it's distressing for the victim to be accused; is it not?

965 5:00:41

DR. CURRY: Absolutely.

966 5:00:41

MS. BREDEHOFT: It causes them a lot of fear?

967 5:00:44

DR. CURRY: Certainly.

968 5:00:45

MS. BREDEHOFT: And it causes them a lot of distress?

969 5:00:48

DR. CURRY: Absolutely, yes.

970 5:00:49

MS. BREDEHOFT: And, in fact, they feel falsely accused, correct?

971 5:00:54

DR. CURRY: Yes.

972 5:00:54

MS. BREDEHOFT: And they feel paranoid?

973 5:00:56

DR. CURRY: Yes.

974 5:00:57

MS. BREDEHOFT: And they feel frightened?

975 5:00:58

MS. BREDEHOFT: Yes. Afraid that everyone's going to believe the perpetrator, correct?

976 5:01:02

DR. CURRY: Yes.

977 5:01:02

MS. BREDEHOFT: And, in fact, they're afraid they're going to lose their security, correct?

978 5:01:07

DR. CURRY: Can you clarify what you mean by "security"?

979 5:01:09

MS. BREDEHOFT: I'll ask the next one. I And they're afraid they're going to lose their reputation, correct?

980 5:01:14

DR. CURRY: Yes.

981 5:01:18

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now, let's talk about the testing for a moment. You talked about the MMPI-2. But that's not the most recent MMPI, is it?

982 5:01:36

DR. CURRY: No. It's the most researched.

983 5:01:38

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now, you -- you need to have an elevated -- on the MMPI, there was only one section that had elevated scores, correct?

984 5:01:58

DR. CURRY: No, that's not correct.

985 5:01:59

MS. BREDEHOFT: It was the K section, correct?

986 5:02:02

DR. CURRY: That's not correct.

987 5:02:04

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And was there any elevated score over 65 on the MMPI?

988 5:02:12

DR. CURRY: I would need to take a look at it. You know, I provided a 25-page interpretation outline. If you're able to pull that up, I'd be happy to go over any of the individual scores for you.

989 5:02:22

MS. BREDEHOFT: Can you recall any clinical scales for the MMPI-2 for Amber Heard that were above 65, as you sit here today?

990 5:02:33

DR. CURRY: Again, there are multiple, multiple scales on this test, 25 pages worth, listed. So 270s if you can pull it up, then I can review and give you a competent answer.

991 5:02:43

MS. BREDEHOFT: What can you recall, as you sit there?

992 5:02:46

DR. CURRY: I'm hesitant to do that because I don't want to make an error by ignoring hundreds of scale scores.

993 5:02:51

MS. BREDEHOFT: And would you agree that you can't make a pathological determination or diagnosis if the scales are not elevated on the MMPI?

994 5:02:59

DR. CURRY: I would not agree with that

995 5:03:02

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now, one of the answers that Amber gave is that it's hard for her to feel safe, correct?

996 5:03:12

DR. CURRY: Where are we? Are you talking about the MMPI-2?

997 5:03:13
998 5:03:15

DR. CURRY: Again, I don't recall. There are 567 items on that. I would need to see her results.

999 5:03:20

MS. BREDEHOFT: Well, it's a common trauma symptom, isn't it, to not feel safe?

1000 5:03:25

DR. CURRY: Sure.

1001 5:03:25

MS. BREDEHOFT: And safety concerns are common among women who have been victimized, correct?

1002 5:03:30

DR. CURRY: Women and men, yes.

1003 5:03:32

MS. BREDEHOFT: And common, especially, for sexually victimized people; would you agree?

1004 5:03:37

DR. CURRY: Any type of victimization, yes.

1005 5:03:40

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And hard to trust; that's a common after-effect of interpersonal-violence-related trauma, correct?

1006 5:03:47

DR. CURRY: Sure.

1007 5:03:48

MS. BREDEHOFT: And memory difficulties. Amber said she felt she had holes.

1008 5:03:53

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall that?

1009 5:03:55

DR. CURRY: I do.

1010 5:03:55
1011 5:03:56

DR. CURRY: And her account was different than typical memory difficulties with trauma.

1012 5:04:01

MS. BREDEHOFT: It is common for individuals who have experienced trauma to not --

1013 5:04:04

DR. CURRY: It's actually not common, no. It's a symptom, but it's the least common.

1014 5:04:10

MS. BREDEHOFT: In fact, a DSM-5 diagnosis for PTSD includes a "inability to remember an important aspect of the traumatic event"; am I correct?

1015 5:04:23

DR. CURRY: Yes.

1016 5:04:25

MS. BREDEHOFT: And memory difficulty is a symptom of PTSD, correct?

1017 5:04:29

DR. CURRY: Certain types of memory difficulties, yes.

1018 5:04:32

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now, do you recall when Amber says the first incident of abuse took place?

1019 5:04:39

DR. CURRY: I believe it was - oh, the first incident in which she - yes. So, she stated that it was early on in their relationship.

1020 5:04:47

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Do you recall it --

1021 5:04:49

DR. CURRY: I don't recall an exact date off the top of my head.

1022 5:04:52

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you recall it being a tattoo, something related to a tattoo?

1023 5:04:55

DR. CURRY: I do.

1024 5:04:56

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now, if someone had been subjected to a four-year relationship characterized by repeated IPV, they can have symptoms, correct?

1025 5:05:07

DR. CURRY: Yes.

1026 5:05:08

MS. BREDEHOFT: Intense anxiety?

1027 5:05:10

DR. CURRY: Yes. Certainly.

1028 5:05:11

MS. BREDEHOFT: Depressed or irritable states?

1029 5:05:15

DR. CURRY: Actually, it's not so much states. Is When you're looking at real trauma reaction, it's pretty persistent. It's less of these transient states. ' 1:

1030 5:05:24

MS. BREDEHOFT: Intimate problems?

1031 5:05:25

DR. CURRY: Yes.

1032 5:05:26

MS. BREDEHOFT: Relationship difficulties?

1033 5:05:29

DR. CURRY: Yes.

1034 5:05:30

MS. BREDEHOFT: And these are symptoms you're also attributing to the personality disorder, correct?

1035 5:05:33

DR. CURRY: Yes, there are some key differences.

1036 5:05:36

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Now let's talk, for a moment, specifically about a couple of the profiles on the MMPI.

1037 5:05:43

MS. BREDEHOFT: This is not an exaggerated profile for her, is it?

1038 5:05:48

DR. CURRY: No. Actually, that was something unique. When she completed objective broadband measures, where the questions, you don't know what the questions are getting at, they seem completely random, she raised scores that indicated that she was trying to minimize any mental issues and appear completely free of pathology. When she exaggerations.

1039 5:06:16

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right. Let's go to page 337.

1040 5:06:47

MS. BREDEHOFT: My question, on line 7, "This is not an exaggerated profile, is it, for her?"

1041 5:06:53

MS. BREDEHOFT: And your answer, under oath, at that time, was, "No. It was not an exaggerated profile."

1042 5:06:58

MS. BREDEHOFT: Do you see that?

1043 5:06:59

DR. CURRY: Yes. I'm talking about the MMPI here.

1044 5:07:00

MS. BREDEHOFT: And you testified --

1045 5:07:00

DR. CURRY: Yes.

1046 5:07:01

MS. BREDEHOFT: You testified under oath at that time, correct?

1047 5:07:04

DR. CURRY: Yes, that's correct

1048 5:07:06

MS. BREDEHOFT: Now, the profile is also not consistent with malingering, correct?

1049 5:07:12

DR. CURRY: The MMPI-2 profile, it's specific to how she approached this test, and you're correct, for this test, it was a defensive profile, not an exaggerated profile.

1050 5:07:23

MS. BREDEHOFT: So my question, on line 10, was, "This is not a profile consistent with malingering, correct?"

1051 5:07:28

MS. BREDEHOFT: And your answer, under oath, at that time, was, "Correct. On this test, it is not consistent with malingering," right?

1052 5:07:32

DR. CURRY: Yes.

1053 5:07:36

MS. BREDEHOFT: That was your full answer? Okay.

1054 5:07:40

MS. BREDEHOFT: Now, is it your testimony, under oath today, that you have not been asked to testify concerning Ms. Heard's behavior in the context of her relationship with Mr. Depp, including any abuse?

1055 5:07:56

DR. CURRY: That's correct.

1056 5:07:58

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And you have not made any determinations, including any opinions that Ms. Heard abused Mr. Depp or Mr. Depp abused Ms. Heard, correct?

1057 5:08:10

DR. CURRY: Correct. That's outside the scope of psychology.

1058 5:08:12

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. And you cannot testify whether Amber Heard suffered any emotional distress as a result of statements Mr. Depp made through Mr. Waldman, correct?

1059 5:08:26

DR. CURRY: What I can testify is that there was no indication of a decline in psychological functioning showing any injury since she's been 1111 with Mr. Depp.

1060 5:08:36

MS. BREDEHOFT: You cannot testify, one way or the other, on that, correct?

1061 5:08:39

MS. BREDEHOFT: Your Honor, may we approach?

1062 5:09:10

THE COURT: Okay.

[STAGE DIRECTION]: (Sidebar.)

1064 5:09:12

THE COURT: All right.

1065 5:09:14

MS. BREDEHOFT: Your Honor, she was specifically prohibited from testifying to any emotional distress related to defamation. She was trying to throw in a little extra there.

1066 5:09:17

MR. DENNISON: Well, you asked the question directly.

1067 5:09:19

MS. BREDEHOFT: I did because I wanted to establish she can't.

1068 5:09:21

THE COURT: Well, if you ask the question, though, I'm not -- you're saying she's banned from answering but then you ask the question.

1069 5:09:23

MS. BREDEHOFT: All right. I will clear it up, then. I think she can't.

1070 5:09:26

THE COURT: She can if you ask her the question, though. That's the problem

1071 5:09:28

MS. BREDEHOFT: I don't agree with that. She didn't give that opinion (indiscernible), she didn't give that in her 116 designation.

1072 5:09:30

THE COURT: But if you ask the ! question, she's going to answer it.

1073 5:09:32

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay, Your Honor. I'll clean it up and then I'm done.

1074 5:09:35

MR. DENNISON: Thank you, Your Honor.

1075 5:09:37

THE COURT: Yep.

[STAGE DIRECTION]: (Open court.)

[SECTION HEADER]: BY MS. BREDEHOFT:

1078 5:09:39

MS. BREDEHOFT: Dr. Curry.

1079 5:09:40

DR. CURRY: Yes.

1080 5:09:41

MS. BREDEHOFT: In your report, nowhere in your report did you provide any opinion of whether Ms. Heard suffered emotional distress as a result of the defamatory statements; is that correct?

1081 5:09:53

DR. CURRY: That's correct

1082 5:09:54

MS. BREDEHOFT: Okay. Thank you.

1083 5:09:54

MS. BREDEHOFT: I have no further questions.

1084 5:09:58

THE COURT: All right Redirect

[SECTION HEADER]: EXAMINATION BY COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF AND

1086 5:10:03

MR. DENNISON: Dr. Curry, you were just asked a question about malingering.

1087 5:10:08

DR. CURRY: Yes.

1088 5:10:09

MR. DENNISON: And made reference to the MMPI-2.

1089 5:10:12

MR. DENNISON: Is there another test that you did to make a determination with respect to malingering?

1090 5:10:17

DR. CURRY: Yes. So, I also - well, malingering is a term that most psychologists, we try to be careful of it because it indicates an intent for secondary gain. I prefer feigning, which you brought up earlier, because it indicates someone is intentionally exaggerating but I don't know, necessarily, why. So, I think that's a more accurate term, in general.

1091 5:10:39

DR. CURRY: On the MMPI-2, yes, there was no exaggerated profile. I also gave her the CAPS-5, I don't know if you'll remember, but that is the clinician-administered PTSD scale consistent with the DSM-5. And on that, there were signs of gross exaggeration.

1092 5:10:58

DR. CURRY: I also looked at the test results that were provided by Dr. Hughes, and on an objective test of trauma, there is a scale specific to intentional exaggeration on that test, and Ms. Heard was in the 98th profile - 98th percentile, meaning that she is - she - she had engaged in extreme levels of exaggeration.

1093 5:11:27

MR. DENNISON: Thank you.

1094 5:11:29

MR. DENNISON: You were asked about intimacy problems, relationship difficulties associated with IPV, and you, then, said there were some key differences.

1095 5:11:41

DR. CURRY: Yes.

1096 5:11:42

MR. DENNISON: What are those?

1097 5:11:44

DR. CURRY: So, what you see, when we're talking about the personality disorders, is there is a very consistent pattern of the aggression, the violence, the irritability. First of all, it's escalated. But second of all, it occurs when there is either, for the borderline component, a threat of abandonment, a perceived slight, feeling like the person is about to leave you, about to walk away to get some space from an argument. It also occurs to a less -- more mild extent, but when there's a loss of attention and a need to manipulate to try to get that attention back.

1098 5:12:17

DR. CURRY: But I it's not -- when somebody has PTSD, that l irritability is sort of at a low, constant level, or it's completely random. For instance, you I might have a Vietnam vet who went straight to bars, for a period, to get into fights, with the I I hope that he would kill somebody and just self-destruct. So, it's a very different type of presentation.

1099 5:12:38

DR. CURRY: IPV, it might be more irritability, but that's actually less of a symptom for female IPV victims. Usually, what you'll see is somatic symptoms, the depression, a lot of fearfulness and anxiety, but, typically, more complaints about somatic symptoms.

1100 5:12:55

MR. DENNISON: Okay. You testified that some of the professionals involved in this case had to take I their patient at her word.

1101 5:13:05

MR. DENNISON: What did you mean by that?

1102 5:13:07

DR. CURRY: So, when you're providing therapy, you're in a very different role than an examiner. When you're the forensic examiner, you're just really looking at data to make a decision. When you're a therapist, you're an advocate for your client's well-being, and, in fact, it's considered extremely unethical for a treating provider to ever provide opinion testimony, like I'm providing, because it's so well known in our field that you're going to have an automatic bias for your client. It's almost a sense of protection, advocacy, wanting their best, which is why we also know that it's very inappropriate to convey any sort of opinion about whether a crime occurred, whether abuse occurred. We can certainly believe our clients. We can support them in their therapy and take them at their word, but when giving opinions and consultations, we have to be very, very cautious and really only provide the facts.

1103 5:14:03

DR. CURRY: We would state things in terms of my client did report this, I saw this, here was our treatment plan, here was the diagnosis. We just - we're taught, we're trained, to stay away from making any sort of opinions, understanding that most of the time, and most of Ms. Heard's providers were just treating Ms. Heard. They had never so much as done an initial interview with Mr. Depp and gotten his whole life story or his symptoms, his side of any of it. And they're going to be advocating, and the treatment relationship is about helping your client achieve well-being, not p g y g, making formal psychological or psychiatric opinions.

1104 5:14:44

MR. DENNISON: So you were asked a question about the series of doctors.

1105 5:14:49

MR. DENNISON: Dr. Cowan, treating physician?

1106 5:14:51

DR. CURRY: Yes, he was a psychologist.

1107 5:14:55

MR. DENNISON: Dr. Banks, treating physician?

1108 5:14:55

DR. CURRY: Dr. Banks, yes, treating psychiatrist.

1109 5:14:58

MR. DENNISON: Dr. Anderson?

1110 5:15:00

DR. CURRY: Yes, treating psychologist.

1111 5:15:02

MR. DENNISON: Every one of them had to take Amber Heard at her word, right?

1112 5:15:04

THE COURT: Excuse me.

1113 5:15:07

MS. BREDEHOFT: Leading.

1114 5:15:09

THE COURT: Oh, overrule. I'll allow it.

1115 5:15:11

MR. DENNISON: Thank you. No further questions.